Evening knowledgable folk.
Firstly this is going to be quite long, secondly it's hypothetical (mostly) but a few words of wisdom would be appreciated…
In a few weeks time I'm off to Harrogate and I intend to get there early on Friday in the hope of grabbing a bargain or two.
One of the 'requirements' I'm evaluating is the ability to hold various rotating cutters at the headstock/spindle end of the lathe. Things like slitting saws, fly cutters, maybe even end mills and slot drills.
Now my lathe is a CJ18. I bought it from Simon at SPG tools at last year's show. For anyone who doesn't know it's a lathe that is essentially also sold by Warco (Super Mini), Amadeal (7×14 mini lathe) and Chester (Conquest)
Again, for those who are unfamiliar, the mandrel doesn't have a nose thread, instead the spindle has an integral flange with a locator step. The flange does the job of a backplate and a chuck of the same outside diameter (mine is a 100mm version) and with a matching recess fits to the flange-plate-thingy. The flange is integral, it cannot be removed, See Pics
:
The spindle bore is 20mm (ish) with MT3 taper. Which brings me back to mounting my (so far imaginary) cutters.
I know I could buy 'quite cheaply' (or potentially even make, 'quite slowly'
arbours for my various requirements, from soft stub mt3 blanks (equipped with drawbar threads) BUT Alex Collin's Idris build thread has highligted an issue with lathes like mine in that there isn't much room if you seat (in his example) an MT3 arbour within the mandrel for the the workpiece (I'm thinking about making multiple parallel incisions here, along a long workpiece). What alex ended up doing was mounting his MT? arbour in his chuck, quite extended to get the room, which worked but he acknowledged himself that it wasn't exactly ideal…
What I'm actually thinking is that an ER type collet chuck would be a better proposition in that it would allow the use of standard milling tools etc in a suitable sized collet, hold small round work more concentrically than the chuck, and take straight-shafted arbours for saws, fly cutters etc. The benefit over traditional tapered arbours would be that the chuck body and collet retainer would push whatever cutter that bit further (I'm guessing around 20-30mm depending on which ER size I plump for) away from the flange. When the cutter holder itself is taken into account we could obtain some useful distance!
This leaves another quandry though: I could get an MT3 collet chuck, like I believe are sold for milling machines really (apologies to ARC for the use of your info):
**LINK**
or I could get one of the more bespoke flange mounted ones that ARC, RDG, etc. sell:
**LINK**
So, my question to anyone who's managed to read this far, what would you do?
1.) Buy/make MT3 arbours for whatever cutter I'm using, with as much length as can be found?
2.) Buy (or I suppose even make, but I think the ER system requires more that I'm yet capable of) a MT3 & drawbar style ER collet chuck (and a few collets abviously)?
3.) As above, but the spindle/flange mount version?
D.) Something different Steven, you obviously don't have a clue!?
Thanks in advance for any replies, I know that this has been a bit of an odyssey.
Steve, Manchester