I went to a Grammar School, where, alas, practical skills weren’t a priority. Syllabus academic and intense, aimed at getting us into University or a Profession, not jobs. 80 minutes maximum of woodwork or metalwork per week up to age 16, then none unless an individual has a special talent. (In my year 1 of 120 did advanced metalwork, and 0 did advanced woodwork)
Basically two streams, humanities and science, with cross-over allowed if the timetable permitted it: a friend did A-level Maths, Physics, Russian and Economics:
- Both streams did Maths and English plus French or German up to age 16, then we specialised. Plus games, which I hated, not least because they injured me doing Physical Education! My parents should have sued – it affected my life.
- Arty boys focussed on languages (often two or more, ancient and modern), Literature, History, Economics, Art, Music, Drama, Politics, and Geography
- Scientists focussed on Maths, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, and Geography.
- Many introductory support lessons (no exams) : I did Technical Drawing, Art Appreciation, Maths for Scientists, Civics, Debating, Computing, Logic, Economics, Ethics, Politics and Philosophy.
- Very little space in the timetable for hands-on.
We were taught to think rather than develop practical skills. Rather than learn how to sharpen HSS, I was told to read Machiavelli’s “The Prince” and other challenging texts. The school taught research, how to assess evidence, logic, and the need to apply rational thought to decision making. Not righty-tighty, lefty-loosy!
Children who failed the Grammar School entrance exam (the 11+ taken at age 11) went to a Technical School or a Secondary Modern. These emphasised vocational rather than academic skills, and spent much more time on hands-on. Technical Schools cherry picked children who did well on 11+’s maths/technical side, but were weak on English/arty stuff. Technical Schools focussed on educating for industry, skilled trades, applied science (lab technicians), engineering, building, carpenters, machinists, electricians etc. A good idea that didn’t work out, possibly because they couldn’t get enough skilled teachers. Many areas didn’t have them.
An unfortunate side-effect of the British Grammar/Secondary Modern system is that it drove a wedge between techies who should have been in the same team. Grammar school trained engineers tended to see themselves as an elite to the point of despising “mere artisans”, a serious mistake. Equally bad is the tendency for non-academic engineers to see graduate engineers as a bunch of practical incompetents, allegedly unable to work a screwdriver, and hopeless in the real-world. Very unhealthy, because engineering requires people who can think AND people who can do. Not closing the gap is the next best thing if you want to damage British Industry as leaving the EU with no viable trade alternative.
Merging Grammar Schools and Secondary Moderns into Comprehensives didn’t seem fix the wedge problem, and if my friend’s and nephew’s experience of Academies is typical, they’re broken too. (He was school technician, they were pupils.) One issue, they thought, was not enough teachers understood technology, in practice or theory. Not the teacher’s fault; they have to be recruited and trained in large numbers, which “the system” struggles to do.
Plenty of extra-curricular interest at my school in motor bikes and engines, though much less than chemistry, electronics and radio. Model aircraft were popular. There was maths club! None of us sharpened HSS, or knew about carbide inserts…
One formative experience. I was mucking about unsupervised in the metalwork room, when a group of older yobs crashed a Colchester’s saddle into the chuck at high-speed. Lathe still worked apart from making a noise like nuts and bolts being flung about inside an oil drum. We all left in a hurry, looking angelic, and the lathe was still broken 3 years later. A good example of a previously wonderful lathe that no-one should buy second-hand. It’s why I tell everyone who will listen than “condition is everything” – Colchesters are not boy-proof!
🙁
Dave