Posted by Samsaranda on 23/05/2021 08:38:58:
Did these draconian powers come into being because of our membership of the EU where all member states were required to have parallel systems in place ? Dave W
No. Responsibility lies with parliament. And the government are looking to extend the powers granted to the DWP at the moment. Nothing to do with the EU.
Most of us are dead against benefit fraud. Unfortunately, too many imagine fraud is only committed by drunken ne'er do wells living idle lives of luxury on council estates at taxpayer expense; they aren't aware fraud is committed on a large scale by wealthy folk too. When applying for state support – care homes etc, applicants have to declare their capital: many lie! As fraud is rife, the state checks suspicious claims, including yours…
Mark Rand mentions RIPA, also nothing to do with the EU. Introduced in 2000 by Labour, it's since been strengthened by Conservative governments. Analysis of internal DWP Guidance on applying RIPA by Privacy International shows much more than checking bank accounts:
Guidance for staff includes rules around physically monitoring those suspected of fraud, gathering CCTV videos, looking at someone’s social media activity and investigating employers who may be seen as assisting fraudulent activity.
Suspected benefit fraudsters in the UK are being subjected to excessive surveillance techniques such as being tailed by government officers or identified in CCTV footage.
The DWP work with private companies – some of which may be an individual’s service providers. These companies are obliged to hand over information if there are reasonable grounds to believe that the individual is or could be involved in a benefits-related offence.
Companies who can be asked for this include bingo clubs, the BBC, estate agents, gyms, legal aid boards, banks and the NHS counter fraud department, which can hand over GP registration and checks of medical cards.
The DWP say: “Privacy International’s report grossly mischaracterises the use, and extent, of DWP powers, which are subject to independent scrutiny. The limited powers that the department does possess are used to prevent and detect potential crime, with surveillance conducted only when the department is investigating potential fraud, and even then only in cases where all other relevant lines of inquiry have been exhausted.”
In my view they are both right, depending on how the powers are applied case-by-case. Fraud and fraud counter-measures are nothing but bad news for innocent bystanders!
As an aside, this DWP graph shows a sharp rise in fraud since the UK left the EU.

Or not! I suggest the graph demonstrates how difficult it is to identify cause from effect. Three obvious possibilities:
- Brexit is causing more fraud.
- The red dotted line shows the point at which the DWP changed the way they detect and report fraud. So the increase may not a rise at all, it's more accurate reporting of previously undetected fraud.
- Coronavirus!
Or all three together. Nothing is simples, check the evidence!
Dave