Thanks for the comments from all;
Zan,
I can say definitively that the stepper I have used may STILL be to small…It is a NEMA23, double stack motor, which still only gives around 1/2 the torque an NEMA34 single stack motor will give. Diameter relates directly to torque. The problem with torque requirements has nothing to do with being able to turn the table – its all to do with acceleration of the table which in my particular way of implementing the hobber is an issue. I am trying to 'exactly' simulate a mechanically geared hobber. Such a hobber will allow you to stop hobbing teeth in the middle of a job,ie, cut power to the hob spindle, and without disengaging the hob from the gear blank, simply re-apply power to the hob spindle motor. The mechanical gearing will force the blank to keep step with the hob pitch. Acceleration of the blank is mechanically linked to the hob spindle and synchronisation is always maintained.
NEMA23 is not that big? 2.3"x2.3" by about 4" long…
I am not sure this requirement is real, but it seems useful to be able to just stop, clean the teeth and have a gander to see how things are doing, and carry on where you left off?
The blank must do the same even when stepper driven, but now the stepper is driven by pulses that have a synchronised relationship to the encoder pulses from the hob spindle encoder. Typically, the hob on a 'home-hobber' will spin up from 0 to around 300RPM within 200ms to 300ms. As an example, for a MOD 0.8, 20 tooth gear, with a hob rpm of 300rpm, the blank must turn at 15rpm. Assume a typical 40:1 gearing between stepper and blank, the stepper must spin at 600RPM.
So, we need to accelerate the stepper from 0 to 600RPM within 300ms, under load, synchronised to the Hob encoder pulses, without loosing steps…With, in my case the large inertial mass on the rotary table, chuck, etc, and the friction as well. So far the math says the stepper I have used, running at 75volts in Half Step, will do the job within 450ms – difficult to mathematicate better than that, as friction coefficient is a bit of a thumb suck, so err on the high side.
For a 100 tooth gear, the stepper target rpm is only 120RPM, so much easier.
John,
The software is free to all, however as with all these things there are complications! My implementation has buttons, encoders, jog-wheel encoders, seven segment displays and used the STM processor range and the NUCLEO STM Arduino look-alike. You would need the circuits as well to fathom what I have done, but if proficient in C, I have no doubt you could port it to the 'normal' Aduino range.
MichaelG,
I would almost suggest that you go ahead and use the worm/wheel you have and we give it a bash and see how it does! At least you could progress and maintain the interest!
Joe