On
10 January 2026 at 17:51 cedric 1 Said:
If you want to get an idea of Chinese machine quality and after sales service, do a search of this site for “Warco” and read the many threads posted by owners of those machines.
Have you done that and what was the result? The hit list is 382 pages long indicating a popular supplier. My quick spot check doesn’t suggest many quality problems, though they certainly happen.
Searching for Myford gets an 840 page list, and a spot check reveals many problems, mostly age related wear and tear. Exactly what’s expected of ageing machines. What to do about worn beds, bearings, lead-screws, half-nuts, and clutches. Sorting out broken bull wheels, stuck chucks, duff motors, bed twist, and lubrication problems. Replacing belts, where to get change wheels, especially 127 teeth, and how to fit 3-phase and QCTP. Electrical problems especially capacitors, centrifugal switches and Dewhursts. People worrying about paint colour. Suggests condition is far more important than quality, whatever that is!
I haven’t done a full search for everything on lathes.co.uk:
Sherline: 42 pages,
Taig: 26 pages
Seig: 28 pages
Boxford: 214 pages
Cowells: 39 pages
Colchester: 116 pages
Proxxon: 36 pages
Unimat: 62 pages
Schlaubin: 1 page
Hardinge: 26 pages
Adept: 44 pages
Flexispeed: 17 pages
Amadeal: 45 page
Be interesting to wade through them all to find what their relative shortcomings are based on member experience. A lot of hard work when it can be simplified for beginners:
- When buying second-hand tools the marque matters much less than the condition. The make of a machine tool does not protect it from abuse, wear and tear, damp, or age. These all depend on history, not the original build quality. The only way to assess condition is to check the machine out physically, which is not easy for beginners to do. It’s the product that assures the brand, not the other way round. Notions of “quality” do not protect your money! A scrap Rolls Royce is still only scrap.
- Buying new means condition is assured. If a new tool is delivered damaged, parts are missing, or the thing is wonky, the purchasers dosh is protected by consumer law, the warranty, and the sellers desire to maintain his reputation. Difficult to go wrong buying new unless buying “too cheap” from a disreputable vendor, especially one outside the British consumer protection umbrella. But people do buy direct, and get away with it – the quality is “good enough”.
My experience with a Chinese workshop is that the tools are fit for purpose and value for money. Still going strong after 11 years. Two small problems with the lathe, both easily fixed by minor fettling, and the milling machine was OK straight off the pallet. The band-saw looked dreadful and performed badly, but was fixed by obvious minor fettling in an afternoon, since when it just works. The problem was an indifferent build, not difficult to put right, and very affordable.
My mini-lathe had several shortcomings, but nowhere near as bad as the critics suggested. Performed well once I got used to it and made a few minor improvements. Impossible I think to tell the difference between parts made on it and the same parts made on a much more expensive machine. True the expensive machine should be easier to drive and produce results faster, but a hobbyist might not need either. I don’t.
Quality is only worth having if it delivers value and is affordable. As an abstract concept it’s a red-herring. And firms offering quality goods that no-one buys go straight down the toilet. The price has to be right.
Dave