On
17 November 2025 at 10:46 parovoz Said:
Being experienced in vacuum testing, one thing to verify is that all your connectors and feed throughs are vacuum rated, many are not, an a pin head leak in such a small chamber will kill the vacuum. ALSO, make sure you have no wires passing through to the chamber. Even if they are fully sealed ‘potted up’ around the cable, air can leak down between the conductors. If we get a customer with lots of cables going into a chamber, we have to dissect them to get the likes of ‘silca set’ into them to prevent any leakage.
All the best.
Your input will be most welcome!
There’s another question coming about what I’m calling the Bulkhead Penetrator (in Naval parlance a device for passing cables safely between compartments when one of them is accidentally filled with water.)
It will carry 6 wires and the exhaust pipe. In the companion “Clock Measuring” thread, Robert explained that plastic cable insulation leaks, so initial thoughts are a brass screw-fitting, with o-ring on the outside, pipe central surrounded by six metal spikes, the whole lot potted in epoxy. CAD model coming later. Very grateful for a professional critique when the time comes, because I’m an amateur taking a walk on the wild side.
Might be 7 wires because John Haine suggested a d**n good reason for adding another one this morning!
As a taster of innocence abroad here’s the valve I made today.

It’s modified Presta bicycle valve, inverted, with an adaptor to fit a 4mm diameter PTFE pipe. If it doesn’t hold the vacuum, Michael has identified a commercial source of vacuum valves, so they’re Plan B. Unless someone has a better suggestion! (I’ve noted Wade’s advice, ta.)
Fans of unusual threads will notice the valve. It’s a DIN7756 (Metric 6.0mm 0.8 pitch) I’m confused: some sources say it’s compatible with M6 × 1.0 and has the usual 60° V form. I had to make an adaptor and thread it with a special tap…
Dave