NASA testing the limits of engineering again

NASA testing the limits of engineering again

Home Forums The Tea Room NASA testing the limits of engineering again

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #520344
    Ady1
    Participant
      @ady1

      When it finally gets going we'll be back to our 1960s achievements of 50 years ago

      All the Russian stuff went badoom

      The Saturn 5 stuff really was at the edge of our abilities and the US did amazingly well to make it viable, albeit at huge expense

      Now we have a new generation of new people with new technology having a go at it again

      …first major glitch achieved in 60 seconds…

      —————–

      Shortly before 22:30 GMT (17:30 EST) on Saturday, the four engines ignited, burning for more than a minute before the event was aborted

      **LINK**

      #36239
      Ady1
      Participant
        @ady1
        #520346
        Neil Lickfold
        Participant
          @neillickfold44316

          Goes to show how good the engineers really were that developed the Saturn5 1st stage rocket engine. One of a few designs with zero failures. Just goes to show that the engineers in this program have not simulated nor thought out all the issues that the engines are actually facing. A lot needs to be considered , and takes very special people to be able to look at the over all system, and see the potential issues. Often single tests are totally successful , but when multiple engines are employed issues begin to arise that were not there for the single engine test. Sometimes it is a frequency clash that can cause a whole lot of previously undisclosed issues. That happened on the first multi engine aircraft.

          #520347
          David Colwill
          Participant
            @davidcolwill19261

            Not too ambitious then.

            I thought from the title that they might be trying to get them to agree on something! smile p

            I must admit, it is good to see them trying to get back to the moon.

            Regards.

            David.

            #520348
            BC Prof
            Participant
              @bcprof

              Let us hope that the engineers continue to see the "Big Picture" and not just what would meet a particular immediate goal.

              I once asked my yr 8 science class whether they would put people in a room with a pure oxygen atmosphere with anything that could burn and then lock them in . They all said no. Shame that the Apollo 1 capsule designers did not think in the same way when they were concerned with meeting certain goals.

              Brian

            Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
            • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

            Latest Replies

            Home Forums The Tea Room Topics

            Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
            Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

            View full reply list.