I have not got much further on this subject than previously outlined but the following may be useful. After a lot of messing about experimenting with different jets I finally settled on a number 8 for my Gauge 1 V2 loco. The boiler on this loco is about 11 inches long and approx 2 inches diameter. The ceramic burner is approx 2 inches x 2 1/2 inches.
The following notes may also be of interest. As designed, the boiler is of the sealed system type where all the air required for combustion (primary air) is sucked in by the gas jet. A number 8 and a number 10 jet failed miserably and from the fumes coming out of the chimney it was quite evident that nowhere near complete combustion was taking place. I then fitted a number 5 jet which although smaller, sucked in more air as the gas velocity through the smaller orifice was greater. This improved things somewhat but performance was not as I expected. I then decided that I was not happy with the sealed system and remade the ceramic burner to allow for some secondary air to enter the firebox. The smokebox was also altered to give a Stephenson effect. Now there was not enough gas for the air available and so the number 8 was refitted and the whole thing has balanced out quite nicely with a nice cherry red glow to the ceramic burner. The gas used is butane with a liquid feed from the bottom of the gas tank fed to the burner jet via a preheater loop silver soldered to the firebox. This is so much easier to manage than taking gas from the top of the gas tank with the consequent drop in pressure as the tank cools.
In short I would say that a number 8 is capable of delivering a lot more gas than my loco will take and I would certainly not argue with Stuart Models.
If you do come up with any information enabling a calculation to be made matching jet to application I would love to see it. I got rather bogged down trying to research this subject and finally decided that as I had found a solution to my immediate problem my time would be better spent on other workshop matters.
Mick