I have been reading about wax chucks in de Carle's Watchmaker's and model engineer's lathe with a view to upping my game, especially in turning and finishing components on a smaller scale than I am used to.
One problem I have been having is facing and finishing my clock wheel blanks. In the past I have made wheels out of brass sheet and turned them to the right diameter using a mandrel. The sheet is of uniform thickness and well finished so it has not been necessary to skim the surface.
Cast yellow brass sheet, which I am using for antique restoration because of its colour, is a different matter. Not only is it rough it also needs work hardening by hammering. Any blanks made from this need turning not just on their edges but also their surfaces and when they are very thin holding the work becomes tricky.
I am now thinking that a wax chuck might help. My understanding is that these have to be made of brass (not sure why) and that shellac is used to attach the work.
My questions are:
– is there a practical limit to the size of work which can be held this way as wax chucks seem to be very much a watchmakers' thing?
– how smooth does the surface of the work need to be for it to adhere to the chuck? Would a piece of rough cast brass stick? or a freshly hammered piece?
– is the chuck intended to be somewhat sacrificial? One operation de Carle discusses seems to involve cutting right through the disc, which would seem to risk damaging the chuck. It that perhaps why they are made of brass, so as not to damage the tool?
– I can see why shellac is such a good material; it is reversible and sets slowly as it cools, allowing the work to be centred and pressed on nicely as it is doing so, but are there any more "modern" ways of sticking the blanks on which are as good to better?