surely thats true of lots of tools being able to buy for less than the making but thats not the point is it?
I assume Bernard is commenting on Jason’s comment “do you like liking tools or are the tools just something needed to make what you really want/need“?
Terse is good, but don’t overdo it. I refactored Bernhard’s comment to: ‘It is true that lots of tools can be bought for less than the cost of making them. But that’s not the point, is it?” Apologies if that’s wrong!
It very much is the point, though why depends on what Model Engineering is. In my opinion, ME should be a very broad church, covering all forms of making from restoring full-size machines to any kind of tinkering for pleasure. It includes collecting tools and never using them. Armchair engineering, in which people think rather than do, is allowed. So are CAD, electronics, chemistry, electrics, software, radio, materials science, design and economics.
Professional engineering is strongly focussed on economics, or should be! I believe it was George Stephenson who said:
“An engineer does for a guinea what any fool can do for a pound.” (The internet disagrees: they find the first expression in Wellington’s 1877 book “The Economic Theory of the Location of Railways”. Wellington said “To define it rudely but not inaptly, engineering is the art of doing that well with one dollar, which any bungler can do with two after a fashion.”
The problem with making tools rather than buying them, is cost: time as well as money. Making tools is legitimate when Model Engineering is staving off boredom as a hobby. Beware believing that home-made tools are cheaper; in general they aren’t. (Do a full analysis!) DIY tools are time expensive, and the time might be better spent on actually making things.
Some folk buy a mill and lathe and only use them to make accessories. A full-time occupation because there are so many! Broaches, die holders, file rests, fly-cutters, knurlers, boring heads, vices, rear tool-posts, QCTP, slotters, spotters, grinding attachments, trepanners etc. And then build a Quorn… These folk aren’t daft, but I have different goals.
I make things in support of experimental interests, not tools, miniature replicas, or chuff-chuffs. Making parts is secondary, and making tools wastes time needed elsewhere. Therefore I only make tools when they’re not available off-the-shelf, or I really can save a lot of time and money, or for self-training. I buy tools for a purpose: provided they do the job I don’t care about ‘quality’, and I have better things to do than make them!
Both approaches are allowed. I fight boredom by experimenting, others fight boredom by tool-making! There is no one size fits all, and we shouldn’t criticise how others choose to exploit “Model Engineering”.
We can, and should, point out mistakes, dogma, wishful-thinking, conflations, prejudice, and errors of fact and logic. Ignorance is always bad, as is stubbornly clinging to the past, perhaps hoping a return to traditional methods will somehow make British industry top-dog again. Fraid not. British industry has to meet tomorrow’s needs, and modern engineering is not, repeat not, simple.
Dave