I manage a Website and email 'Group' for my Society and essentially decide what is permissible and what is not.
I don't have any objections to members posting reviews, plugs or YouTube links provided that they are related to members interests and are not offensive. However, we have no sponsors to upset – the Society funds the Website and we use a free messaging service. This Forum clearly operates under different conditions and is essentially part of a commercial operation.
"Offensive" is clearly a subjective matter but since I'm the only Admin and Moderator – it's basically down to me to decide what is 'offensive' – perhaps better defined as being "what is likely to offend our Members" (as opposed to some obscure Facebook Group).
I've only moderated one post (it was never sent) for being unnecessarily rude to another member. The poster was angry and refused to withdraw his post but he's still on there, albeit on full moderation. Another member was upset that I'd actually "stopped someone posting his personal views" and left the system. I had explained that it wasn't the "views" but the language that he'd framed them in but he still left. You cannot (and will not) please everybody.
So, I'm afraid our members have to 'like it or lump it' where my moderation talents are concerned. After all, if anyone feels they can do a better job, they can always ask to do it and I won't stand in their way. Maybe my Society is unique in having lots of folk with great ideas but not so many to actually make them happen.
So – The ME Forum is provided by a commercial company that has to balance the interests of it's subscribers versus the views of it's sponsors and advertisers.
Their Forum – Their Rules. Seems fair enough to me.
Regards,
IanT