Thanks, Michael, always interesting to follow your links. No wish to steal your thunder, however I thought the rather pedestrian video was going to be about the pi = 4 paradox, but it wasn’t… This is the paradox that if a square of side length = 1 is drawn around a circle of diameter = 1, it has a perimeter = 4, whereas the circle’s circumference = pi. Obvious. But if you draw the same ‘circle’, (equivalent to ‘folding in’ the corners of the square, and then the corners of the resulting figure, over and over), with the ‘pen’ constrained to move orthogonally, even as the steps in the approximate circle become vanishingly small, and the trace appears to be a macroscopically smooth circle, its perimeter obstinately stays equal to 4. Counterintuitive – at least for my aged and enfeebled brain…