My authority for what I said. Tubal Cain and the Model Engineers handbook – where, as an engineer of some experience, he specifically says that the rates he quotes are for good tool life and light machines.
I’m delighted that you know so much better than he – I’ll be sure to ask you for advice on such matters in the future. The rest of us just used those figures when all we had was a Myford and a vertical slide, and found they worked very well.
Now I have a proper tool and cutter grinder plus a lot of indexable tooling on a big mill I use the industrial rates suggested by the people who make the tools. Given your obvious knowledge, I was surprised to note that they are substantially higher than those suggested by Tubal Cain – if you were right, they would not be?.
The difference is not generally in depth of cut or cutting speed. What does make the difference is the tooth load, or thickness of cut. (feed rate) in any given material
The real answer is of course that with a bit of experience you get to know when a cutter/material combination is going right, and that it will vary from machine to machine, and with the amount of overhang and support. What you can do with a normal cutter say compared to a long series one, and so forth. However experience is what the beginner doesn’t have, and he has to start somewhere.
TCs figures are a pretty fair place for the amateur to start, and have deen doing so reliably for some years.
Incidentally, if you do the maths for the example I gave you’ll find TC suggests 760rpm, and my example suggests 700, no higher. That is low on your recommendation. So much for industrial rates?
Edited By mgj on 09/02/2011 18:21:18