The flat topped ones with 90 degree top-to-front angles and no hole need negative rake in order to ensure a clearance angle on the front of the cutting edge. They are easier to make and were more commonplace a few years back but the top rake is hardly ideal. However, now that inserts can be sintered to the correct shape including the chipbreaker, it's easier to incorporate a range of positive top rake angles. The net result of positive top rake is lower cutting forces (= bigger cuts, if you like) and better surface finish for steel and aluminium. That's very helpful for small machinery and small scale work like much of what we get up to.
I have several Glanze indexable end mills that use those triangular inserts with flat tops and don't use them any more. I wish they wouldn't sell them, as modern indexable cutters do a better job. Keeps the older factories in India and China in business I suppose.
If anything, I reckon you'd be better off using the CCMT (general steel) and CCGT inserts (for steel finishing and all aluminium), as they are sharper and have more positive rake. Have you tried them? The exception would be cast iron and soft materials like copper, where the GGMW insert shown looks appropriate. I haven't machined CI for years.
Murray