CCMT Carbide Insert PLAIN

CCMT Carbide Insert PLAIN

Home Forums Workshop Tools and Tooling CCMT Carbide Insert PLAIN

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #292783
    Stephen Benson
    Participant
      @stephenbenson75261

      I am after the plain grey insert on the right they suit my applications better and last longer but I have forgotten where I bought them can anyone help.

      dsc02814.jpg

      dsc02816.jpg

      #18474
      Stephen Benson
      Participant
        @stephenbenson75261
        #292810
        Chris Shelton
        Participant
          @chrisshelton11794

          Hi

          Chronos are Glanze agents, they should be able to supply them, or Cromwell tools.

          HTH

          #292813
          Mark Rand
          Participant
            @markrand96270

            MSC/J&L and Cromwell both have them. Look for inserts for cast iron.

            #292815
            Nick_G
            Participant
              @nick_g

              .

              I have found while Glanze tools are OK the tips that come with them are rubbish.! frown – Ones from Sandvik etc. are much better.

              Sorry cannot help with the 'plain' style inserts.

              Nick

              #292818
              JasonB
              Moderator
                @jasonb

                It is not a CCMT as the T indicated a tip with a chipbreaker. Depending on the CSK angle could be W or B which are tips without chipbreaker eg flat topped.

                #292823
                Nick_G
                Participant
                  @nick_g
                  Posted by JasonB on 10/04/2017 18:30:13:

                  tips without chipbreaker eg flat topped.

                  .

                  OK educate me please.

                  What are they designed for / intended use.?

                  Nick

                  #292825
                  JasonB
                  Moderator
                    @jasonb

                    Chipbreaker does as the name suggests and helps the swarf break into small chips rather than give long bits of stringy swarf. The downside is that as the edge is slightly more pointed than that of a flat topped insert they can be a bit more delicate.

                    Someone mentioned looking for inserts for CI, as this does not produce long swarf then there is no real need to use chipbreakers and they may stand up better to the odd hard spot or interupted cut that you can get on a casting. On the other hand flat tops don't work so well on mateials that like a higher top rake angle such as aluminium which will be more likely to stick to the top and generally give a poor finish

                    You can grind a chipbreaker onto HSS tools too, the first three on the left of this set all have a groove to break the chips.

                    #292828
                    Stephen Benson
                    Participant
                      @stephenbenson75261

                      Thanks guys you pointed me in the right direction CCMW060204 is the part number and I have some good quality ones on order, to answer Nick's question they are designed for cast iron and intermittent cutting (cast iron has hard spots) but actually are good for general turning as they give a great finish on steel and do not chip so easily at least in my experience.

                      Edited By Stephen Benson on 10/04/2017 19:38:19

                      Edited By Stephen Benson on 10/04/2017 19:39:56

                      Edited By Stephen Benson on 10/04/2017 19:51:24

                      #292941
                      Ian S C
                      Participant
                        @iansc

                        I use flat topped 16 mm triangle tips (no hole) for the face cutter on the mill (recommended by a fitter and tool maker), they also work quite well in the lathe.

                        Ian S C

                        #292956
                        Muzzer
                        Participant
                          @muzzer

                          The flat topped ones with 90 degree top-to-front angles and no hole need negative rake in order to ensure a clearance angle on the front of the cutting edge. They are easier to make and were more commonplace a few years back but the top rake is hardly ideal. However, now that inserts can be sintered to the correct shape including the chipbreaker, it's easier to incorporate a range of positive top rake angles. The net result of positive top rake is lower cutting forces (= bigger cuts, if you like) and better surface finish for steel and aluminium. That's very helpful for small machinery and small scale work like much of what we get up to.

                          I have several Glanze indexable end mills that use those triangular inserts with flat tops and don't use them any more. I wish they wouldn't sell them, as modern indexable cutters do a better job. Keeps the older factories in India and China in business I suppose.

                          If anything, I reckon you'd be better off using the CCMT (general steel) and CCGT inserts (for steel finishing and all aluminium), as they are sharper and have more positive rake. Have you tried them? The exception would be cast iron and soft materials like copper, where the GGMW insert shown looks appropriate. I haven't machined CI for years.

                          Murray

                        Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
                        • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

                        Latest Replies

                        Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
                        Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

                        View full reply list.