Absolutely nothing wrong with using replacable carbide tip tooling on an ML7. I use them a lot on my Myford without any trouble.
I suspect that you have a lathe problem. Saddle gib strips being loose, worn head stock bearings etc. You should not be using coated tips on aluminium, causes build up of aluminium on the tips then poor cutting and danger of digging in. You have far too much tool protruding from the toolpost. This causes chatter and breakage. ALWAYS use the minimum projection, especially with a well worn lathe.
Somewhat bothered that you do not want to use top speed on your ML7. Nothing wrong with using any speed the lathe is capable of. I suspect that your lathe is badly worn in some areas. A bare metal repaint will not solve these problems!
Andrew.
The above quoted post from Andrew is absolutely spot on as far a tool stick out and speeds go.
Get that tool way back in the toolpost (oh and for hobbyist purposes, the difference in rigidity between a four way tool pist and a decent quality QCTP, whilst definitely the case, is pretty much irrelevant).
Check every interface between the bed, saddle, cross slide, tip slide and tool post. There ought to be be no play anywhere.
The shear plates for the saddle should be adjusted that you can move the saddle up and down the bed smoothly without binding, but the saddle should not rock. The same should be the case for the gibs for the cross slide and top slide.
Spindle speeds? You’re using carbide and turning aluminium, so as fast as you can. You can go slower, it won’t hurt (and in the case of lathes like mini lathes, where the rigidity is extremely lacking, it can be necessary), but BUE when turning aluminium can be an issue, especially when there’s less lubrication than us ideal. I follow Stefan Gotteswinter’s example, and use isopropyl alcohol for aluminium, seems to work well.
The thing about brazed carbide that a lot of people seem to miss, is that the brazed carbide these days doesn’t seem to come ready to use. At worst they might need actually sharpening on a silicon carbide wheel (the green ones), but a lot just need the cutting edges honing with something like a diamond ‘card file’.
I’m rather keen on brazed carbide(albeit the brazed carbide tools I have are all from ‘back in the day’s as the kids say, and we’re acquired from auction lots), but I also use CCMT, CCGT, DCMT, and DCGT inserts (I tend to use uncoated versions of the CCGT/DCGT).
Since like you, I have a benchtop lathe (in my case a Taiwanese Warco 918 from the 90″s), I only use inserts with a nose radius of 0.2 mm or 0.4 mm (so say CCMT09T304, CCMT09T302, CCGT09T304 or CCGT09T302, or the same in DCMT/DCGT). Our machines don’t really have the rigidity to handle the tool pressure that comes with the larger noise radii.
I’ve used the cheapy Chinese inserts and genuine Sandvik, Iscar and Kennametal inserts (the latter three ‘pre-owned’ but unused, from trusted sellers on eBay; still not cheap but less eye watering than buying new!), and whilst the name brand inserts are definitely more durable, with careful use and not extracting the urine, the Chinese cheapies do an okay job.
When you have your Myford nice and tight and well adjusted, don’t be too shy about depth of cut with carbide. You do need to have the nose of the insert decently engaged with the workpiece. That means at least a depth of cut of the nose radius or greater (if you’re used to thinking in imperial as well as metric, like some of us, with a 0.2 mm noise radius that’s about .008″ minimum depth of cut).
Obviously, you can do a shallower DOC, the world won’t end, but the surface finish may well suffer as a result. Nice sharply ground HSS tooling is often better for very shallow DOC really.
EDIT: it seems you are now getting better results. Nice one.