BOTTLE ROCKET

BOTTLE ROCKET

Home Forums General Questions BOTTLE ROCKET

Viewing 8 posts - 26 through 33 (of 33 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #145156
    John Olsen
    Participant
      @johnolsen79199

      I used to do this with students to help get the idea of f=ma across…never tried wings though. We took some video using a camera with a slow motion facility and the observation was that all the water has been expelled by the time that the bottle has done 5 metres or so. We pumped them up to 100psi and never had a bottle failure. We got plenty of cold showers! I presume there is an optimum ratio of air and water in the bottle. More water and less air would give thrust for longer, but the pressure will fall off as the air expands.

      FAI free flight power models used to use high wing, on a sort of pylon, to help with the trim changes associated with the enormous change in speed and attitude between climb and glide. It's not just the CoG shifting, under power the plane is going much faster, so there will be more lift, and since the climb is nearly vertical, the lift is not in a direction you want. (A typical FAI power model used to be able to climb vertically to about 100 metres with a 6 second engine run, then glide for nearly three minutes from that height.) You don't necessarily need to fold the wings away provided you can control the trim.

      On the other hand, how complicated are you allowed to get? Instead of using water for reaction mass, just have the bottle full of air and use it to run a small motor like the CO2 motors that used to be used for model planes. That should give you a pretty long flight time, well into minutes of duration. Should be able to cover a bit of ground in that time.

      John

      #145188
      Ian S C
      Participant
        @iansc

        Kitchen cling wrap, they call it Gladwrap here, shrinks on heating. Ian S C

        #145572
        Jacob Worthington
        Participant
          @jacobworthington64798

          Fantastic ideas and suggestions. I've managed to design and laser cut thin plywood wings. Which should be stronger and better shaped without compromising too much on weight. However before I secure the wings to the main frame, I was wondering if there's a formula that calculates the optimal position of the wings(fore and aft) with regards to the balance between the centre of mass and centre of lift. That the plane neither stalls or nose dives. I imagine that it's application in this instance may be difficult to configure since acceleration is a consideration.

          Really, many many thanks,

          Jacob

          #145574
          jason udall
          Participant
            @jasonudall57142

            Not just acceleration but change of mass..as your rocket discharges water ( reaction mass)..the mass of your motor reduces..and as this is probably most ( or a large proportion) of the launch mass the change in center of gravity will be huge….unless the motor is very small relative to the length of your plane , the cog will move unless already centered on the cog..

            #145576
            Jacob Worthington
            Participant
              @jacobworthington64798

              I had disregarded the mass of the water since I want the rocket to glide to the tune of the weighted nose using the momentum of the takeoff. And also the water will be expelled in literally less than a second.

              Still a consideration?

              Jacob

              #145578
              jason udall
              Participant
                @jasonudall57142

                Say the water is aft of the cog..then the plane will be tail heavy at launch. .this will effect the angle of attack and cause too steep a inital flight.maybe too steep..
                If all goes well then the trim for glide phase will allow the glider to decend from what ever altitude it attained during the rocket phase..
                If you are using a near horizontal launch and the pop bottle is centered about the dry weight cog..then your trim will be mostly correct..there will be a tendency of the water to move to rear of bottle during acceleration causing a change of trim….unless you add a mechanism to adjust trim during launch-cruise..

                #145648
                Neil Wyatt
                Moderator
                  @neilwyatt

                  Jacob,

                  As a rule of thumb for gliding the C of G should be about 1/3 of the wing chord (front to back distance) from the leading edge. For stability you will need about 1/4 the wing area as a tailplane a good 4 chords back from the C of G. Of course all broad generalisations are wrong so expect to experiment.

                  I'd go with a folding Rogallo wing that releases after a delay, myself. No stabiliser needed, suspend the bottle from it so c of g variations caused b y retained water won't matter.

                  Neil

                  #145661
                  MICHAEL WILLIAMS
                  Participant
                    @michaelwilliams41215

                    Bladder tank – works in any orientation .

                    In a model size could be toy balloon inside the pop bottle .

                    Can be arranged to collapse fore and aft or radially .

                  Viewing 8 posts - 26 through 33 (of 33 total)
                  • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

                  Latest Replies

                  Home Forums General Questions Topics

                  Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
                  Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

                  View full reply list.