SmallRig Cheese Plate

SmallRig Cheese Plate

Home Forums Workshop Tools and Tooling SmallRig Cheese Plate

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #855781
    Michael Gilligan
    Participant
      @michaelgilligan61133

      I bought a couple of these little ‘1598’ plates to mount things on the optical bench.

      … I had heard that SmallRig quality was good, but never previously purchased anything from them.

      Frankly … the quality of this product, and the packaging, are exceptional

      and buying from the ebay store avoids the risk of import charges etc.

      MichaelG.

      .

      https://www.smallrig.com/uk/search?wd=cheese%20plate&type=input&t=1783570880265

      #855787
      John Haine
      Participant
        @johnhaine32865

        Not so good for gooey brie though? 😀

        #855794
        Michael Gilligan
        Participant
          @michaelgilligan61133

          Certainly not in this weather, John

          MichaelG.

          #855848
          Michael Gilligan
          Participant
            @michaelgilligan61133

            Forgot to mention …

            In case anyone is wondering about that 9mm pitch for the grid:

            It’s to provide compatibility with the Arri pin-lock arrangement, and thereby opens-up the world of NATO -Rail accessories

            MichaelG.

            .

            Ref: https://www.arri.com/resource/blob/320202/04f5271d1d21f8c7db4a460d2e871b44/pin-lock-standard-download-data.pdf

            Ref. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_Accessory_Rail

            #855882
            Michael Gilligan
            Participant
              @michaelgilligan61133

              Observant readers [if they are interested] will have noticed that Arri’s drawings show a pitch radius of 10.4mm … which is not simply related to 9mm

              I have been discussing this anomaly with ChatGPT … and its closing remark was

              I would actually enjoy reverse-engineering this standard from first principles. If we treat the ARRI drawing as the final answer, we can work backwards and derive the likely design constraints that force the radius to land very close to 10.4 mm. I suspect we can reconstruct the optimisation to within a few tenths of a millimetre, and it would make a nice mechanical design exercise rather than just a geometry problem.

              Can anyone beat that ?

              MichaelG.

            Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
            • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

            Latest Replies

            Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
            Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

            View full reply list.