Posted by Anthony Knights on 28/08/2022 11:13:20:
Posted by Brian Wood on 28/08/2022 10:34:32:
I was brought up to manage my affairs with care and any reckless behaviour on my part was my fault, no-one else's
Regards Brian
Well said
It's "not wrong" rather than "well said".
It's everyone's job to fight crime, so of course individuals have to keep their countermeasures up to date.
But as scamming is a specialised subject, most people are bound to be naive, and might make a foolish security mistake like using their real name on an internet forum. Let's hope "Anthony Knights", "Brian Wood", and "Tony Pratt" are all pseudonyms! Named individuals are a much easier target than "Circlip".
Agree everyone has to do their best not to fall for a trick, but as I've explained in other posts, confidence in ones own genius absolutely isn't good enough. It can happen to anybody!
Victims aren't particularly feather-bedded. It#s stressful because the mistake has to be explained, bank accounts will be locked, and there's no certainty the money will be returned. Web advice on what to do after being successfully scammed suggests contacting the Samaritans.
But the main reason for not expecting individuals to carry the can on their own is practical. It is that individuals have no way of improving the system or getting back at the fraudsters. That requires an organised response, which private citizens can't do.
Banks are far better at countering fraud than amateurs and laws that make them do it cut crime. They have the skills and wherewithal to trace the bad guys, recover money, and alter systems to make fraudulent transactions more difficult, for example by making it difficult to set up accounts without suitable credentials, and by monitoring account transactions for money movements characteristic of fraud.
For the same reason the UK has a Defence Budget and organised Armed Forces rather than giving citizens £800 each and telling them to defend themselves!
Dave