Posted by Michael Gilligan on 06/02/2015 19:37:39:
Posted by Neil Wyatt on 06/02/2015 19:10:31:
I can't find the worst. It showed the 1x3x6 block screwed to the faceplate by the 1×6 face with two M6 screws…
.
Should probably have used 0BA. 
MichaelG.
Which is the same size, but you knew that didn't you ? 
Glad this post has come up on the same page as the MEX judges post as it's interesting to compare the two and another mark for the warts and all over the polish it until it dazzles end result.
In a contemporary magazine there has just been published an article where the engineering is superb, possible too superb in that many of the parts were being shown cylindrically ground.
Why I have no idea other than the author could and ego, because the fit didn't warrant sub micron accuracy and the parts were just soft mild steel anyway. Not many have the facility to cylindrical grind parts. It would have been a better article if the drawings had as much effort put into them as the polish on the finished parts.
However this backfired and the article went unnoticed and uncommented on possibly because it made it far more complex than it needed to be and it just put people off.
Neil's article breathes a breath of fresh air into the subject as it's always easier to improve on something than to try to equal or better perfection. More like a working man's version of George Thomas.
In fact if we take it a step further a modern day version of Jack Radford.
Now for anyone not familiar with Radford's work he was a brilliant engineer and an innovator. Thomas could and did add the bling but Radford was a designer and engineer first and a showman second.
Now I will stand back for incoming flames, bricks and the odd five pound note. 
[Edit] English is not my fore fingers first language.
Edited By John Stevenson on 07/02/2015 16:22:51