Posted by duncan webster on 06/07/2019 10:38:30:
Posted by old mart on 05/07/2019 15:46:37:
I remember quite a few years ago that certain cans of beer had a plastic widget in the can pressurised with nitrogen that caused the dissolved CO2 in the beer to form a fine froth when the can was opened.
Two examples are Boddingtons, and John Smiths extra smooth, still available. Somebody must like the stuff, they are not CAMRA members.
My niece once had a job with John Smiths trying to get pubs to sell that Extra Smooth stuff. She left after I told her that in my opinion, as an experienced beer drinker, it was specially brewed for people who didn't like beer
In my misspent youth I toured pubs with CAMRA friends and found many beers make me ill. Real-ales were most poisonous and I decided the allegedly better taste wasn't worth the risk. Watneys Starlight did me much less harm.
Not being a beer enthusiast myself I noticed many excuses made about real-ale as drunk in pubs: not kept properly (too hot or too cold), disturbed in transit, too young, too old, Master Brewer on holiday, 'r' in the month, pump need cleaning, past it's prime etc etc etc. Despite the current session being average everyone had a tale of the perfect pint they'd enjoyed, 'somewhere else in the distant past'. No-one ever drank a 'perfect pint' in my company!
As the other main topic of conversation was the untried awfulness of 'fizzy beer' I grew suspicious that real-ale might just be ordinary beer with bragging rights. If true this is different psychological territory, nothing to do with taste – people don't spend £20,000 on a Rolex because it keeps better time, or buy personalised number plates because their car goes faster. Real-ale might be a close relative of extreme Serious Audiophilia, which engineers know to be a complete joke.
I don't believe beer tasting has been trialled scientifically? This involves carefully removing all clues and randomising samples to eliminate observer bias. Blindfolding tasters and isolating them during a controlled trial would likely produce very different results from what happens down the pub in front of an audience. Turns out people are good at reading social clues and poor at staying objective in the face of group-think. If you suspect wine judges don't really know what they're talking about draw comfort from this report.
Another example is feeling better after the doctor prescribes an inert medication, the Placebo Effect. What's odd is that placebo effect still works for some people even after they've been told it's a placebo. And despite being trained to eliminate observer bias, scientists also come unstuck from time to time by unconsciously or selfishly interpreting evidence to support a pre-judged conclusion. (Science does better than average though because scientific conclusions and evidence are subjected to well-focussed peer-review, much like some of my dud posts are corrected by forum members.) Even so, changing what we believe is really difficult, even when the belief is shown to be wrong!
I encourage everybody to trial a wide range of beers and report back. Only by getting sloshed shall we determine the truth…
Dave