Moore and Wright 2000 micrometer?

Moore and Wright 2000 micrometer?

Home Forums Workshop Tools and Tooling Moore and Wright 2000 micrometer?

Viewing 4 posts - 26 through 29 (of 29 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #120271
    Michael Gilligan
    Participant
      @michaelgilligan61133
      Posted by Speedy Builder5 on 20/05/2013 12:01:11:

      Well Ian, 13/32 + could be 13/32 full and 13/32 – could be bare – "Simples!" – perhaps set the minimum fraction to be worked to – 32nds, 64ths, 128ths !!

      Bob

      .

      Hang the expense … include 256ths

      [which roughly approximate 254ths]

      … What a pity that the importance of Binary wasn't recognised when they standardized those funny decimal/metric units.

      MichaelG.

      #120278
      Speedy Builder5
      Participant
        @speedybuilder5

        I thought all engineering was BINARY – either it fits or it dosen't. Either it works or it doesn't !

        #120288
        Phil P
        Participant
          @philp

          I still use the "Firkin" as a unit of measure.

          It is very simple to use as its either two firkin long or two firkin short.

          Phil

          Edited By Phil P on 20/05/2013 19:39:44

          #120291
          Sub Mandrel
          Participant
            @submandrel

            You are right Michael. If they had agreed 1"=2.56 mm what a happy world it would be.

            Instead we are left with Phil's binary system.

            Neil

          Viewing 4 posts - 26 through 29 (of 29 total)
          • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

          Latest Replies

          Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
          Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

          View full reply list.