Have I got 12-28 UNF wrong or has Völkel?

Have I got 12-28 UNF wrong or has Völkel?

Home › Forums › Workshop Tools and Tooling › Have I got 12-28 UNF wrong or has Völkel?

Viewing 5 posts - 26 through 30 (of 30 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #865201
    JasonB
    Moderator
      @jasonb

      Bernard, have a look at page 171 of that Volkel PDF I posted early in the thread. Types VE and VX

      Just like spiral point machine taps you can get dies with an additional grind to the leading teeth that curl the swarf forwards when cutting continuously under power and just like the taps they can be used by hand too.

      Dormer do the same thing and use the same “Gun Nose” term.

      #865228
      Bill Phinn
      Participant
        @billphinn90025

        Thanks for the further comments.

        One of the two extra 12-28 dies I said I’d ordered was described as a 13/16” TWT (Threadwise Tools) split die.

        It arrived today. You can see from the photo that what I was sent is in fact another Völkel.

        I tried it out on some EN1A turned down to 5.4 mm with only a small chamfer. The die was put in a 13/16” die stock and the split was opened (though only slightly) for the initial cut. The die didn’t even hesitate to start cutting and it completed the cut with very little effort.

        I then turned another piece of EN1A down to 5.3mm with the same chamfer and tried the first die; even with strong spring pressure bearing against the back of the die stock, the die simply would not begin to cut, and we were in dog point territory again.

        Out of curiosity I turned the die round in the die stock so that the unlettered side was the leading side. I tried again. The die started to cut and I completed the threading.

        I turned down another piece of EN1A to 5.4 mm with a minimal chamfer and tried the original die with the lettered side leading. No way would it start cutting. I flipped the die to have the lettered side facing away and tried cutting again; even though it didn’t start cutting as quickly as the 13/16” die had, it did begin to bite fairly soon  and I completed the threading.

        It would appear that what Howard said a day or so ago about the main chamfer sometimes not being on the lettered side, as you might expect, may be the explanation here after all. I’ve photographed the original 20mm die from both sides and you can decide for yourselves which side looks like it has the primary chamfer; I confess I can’t tell for the life of me. The most perplexing detail is that whilst the chamfers look the same, one is almost impossible to start threading with even when the turned diameter of the stock is way below the basic major diameter.

        On the subject of the through-the-teeth diameter, the 4.23mm shank of a 4.3 mm drill will pass through both dies in their resting state with a zero clearance fit. It is marginally tighter on the 13/16” die.

        The first two images show the new 13/16” die.

        The last two images show the 20mm die chamfer from both sides.

        IMG_2375

        IMG_2376

        IMG_2374IMG_2373ETA: Jason, the silver steel was marked 5.5mm, not 7/32”.

        #865300
        bernard towers
        Participant
          @bernardtowers37738

          difficult to say from your images might be better taken from 45 degs

          #865401
          Howard Lewis
          Participant
            @howardlewis46836

            VERY pleased to see VOLKEL replying on the Forum.

            It is very gratifying to see suppliers watching, and participating in the Forum.

            Should give us all a lot of confidence that we are dealing with folk who take an interest in the end user, to improve their experience of the product.

            Thank You!

            Howard

            #865413
            peak4
            Participant
              @peak4

              I didn’t bother posting this yesterday, as I realised that I’d measured a coarse, rather than fine die; I don’t have a 12UNF28.
              It does however fit in the theme now, regarding lead in chamfers/tapers.
              I bought a wooden toolchest ages ago, which amongst other things contained some unbranded solid round dies; they don’t look to be obviously high quality.
              The only labelling on this one is Taiwan 12NC24, with three cutting edges, (so I couldn’t use my 2 point small hole gauges.)

              According to Zeus, ANC12-24 has a core diameter of 0.1619″ which converts to 4.112mm

              I measured the shank, as well as reading the nominal size of some drill bits, with the following results;

              4.2mm (actual shank size 4.16mm) passed through easily
              4.3mm (actual shank size 4.33mm) would not enter at all

              No18 Zeus-4.3mm (actual shank size 4.24mm) passed 1/2 to 2/3 of the way through from the plain unmarked side only
              No19 Zeus-4.2mm (actual size shank 4.175mm) passed through, with a slightly tighter fit than the metric 4.2mm drill.

              Interestingly it also leaned over to one side slightly, possibly implying that something isn’t square, but I suspect it’s to do with the taper being spread over 3 points.

              The lead in chamfer is quite small on each side, so I wasn’t sure initially which way round one is intended use the die.
              It seems that the actual thread cutting is similar to a No2 tap, rather than a bottoming one.

              i.e. the lead in is a taper, rather than just a chamfer.

              Bill

            Viewing 5 posts - 26 through 30 (of 30 total)
            • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

            Latest Replies

            Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
            Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

            View full reply list.