Good point there Terry and David regarding learning basic skills before writing progs for CNC.
Maybe there should be three classes, pretty much hand made, by manual machine labour and sat behind a desk.
Some of the stuff i used to do it took the best
programmers years to get right and could only get it so far. In all parts supplied that needed filing up and fitting by trial and error was best
they could achieve.
To cap that the end job takes less time but the overall costs were the same.
Or in other words cnc cant do everything its limited to the programmer and may need specific highly skilled labour to put right.
I have made all these individual parts entirely by hand when had to so did my predecessors for 300 years even the screws.
What i dislike about cnc made stuff is when the
writer knows nothing on how to make traditionally, ‘the book says’. Reading books only
tells you so much, best way is on the job learning in at the deep end.
I have several repeat customers that are
brilliant program/operators. They all say what i produce would take them
a solid day and a half to proggy a 5 axis machine but parts would come
off in 15 mins plus 1/2hr finishing. Fine if doing several hundred each
one the same as the next but that aint me everyone different and unique
fitting into a niche market worldwide. Paul on here has seen one item.
Different complexities some take 1 1/4hrs, some can take 4 1/2hrs to make complete as a one off.
Now heres the scenario, what i can do as a one off in 1hr 23 mins, cnc made ones are sold 143% dearer a lot more basic and complete with machine markings! And i am making a killing.
I am not against cnc i have a lathe some where rotting away bought for doing the repeat laborious jobs.
Cnc is fine its all dependant upon the complexity and time given to writing.
I can do two of the three ways very very well, whilst others may be more specific or generalised across the board by other methods.
Which ever method, its still engineering and best of luck.