Emco Compact 5 Handwheel conversion

Emco Compact 5 Handwheel conversion

Home Forums Workshop Tools and Tooling Emco Compact 5 Handwheel conversion

  • This topic has 4 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 7 June 2019 at 10:00 by Jouke van der Veen.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #392373
    Graham Meek
    Participant
      @grahammeek88282

      In a previous thread concerning the merits of owning a Compact 5. I mentioned I was in the process of adding a few up-grades to this particular lathe.

      I offer here a hand wheel conversion to save all the tedium of winding the leadscrew handle to traverse the carriage from one end of the bed to the other.

      This attachment does not require any machining of the existing lathe and bolts on in place of the existing leadscrew nut. I hope to start work on the parts in due course so will keep those interested updated.

      Regards

      Gray,

      emco compact 5 handwheel conversion p2.jpg

      #19216
      Graham Meek
      Participant
        @grahammeek88282
        #392471
        Chris Trice
        Participant
          @christrice43267

          Watching with interest Graham. I've been thinking of adding a custom apron to mine to do just this but I suspect your version will be better than anything I come up with.

          #392548
          Graham Meek
          Participant
            @grahammeek88282

            Thanks Chris for the kind words.

            My first intention was to make a completely new carriage. However the more I thought about it the more I realised this current design was a much simpler solution. Plus it will be quicker to build.

            Regards

            Gray,

            #413070
            Jouke van der Veen
            Participant
              @joukevanderveen72935

              Hallo Graham,

              If I read your drawings well you mount the designed attachment instead of the leadscrew nut and all left to the longitudinal slide.

              Would this not mean that the minimum distance between cross slide and headstock is increased by at least some 50mms? You think this is acceptable for most of the machining operations?

              Regards,

              Jouke

            Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
            • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

            Latest Replies

            Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
            Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

            View full reply list.