Cranked axle

Cranked axle

Home Forums Beginners questions Cranked axle

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #6624
    Eric Cox
    Participant
      @ericcox50497
      #114544
      Eric Cox
      Participant
        @ericcox50497

        I've been looking at the steam engine paintings by Henry Maurice Whitcombe

        bbc.co.uk/arts/yourpaintings/paintings/search/painted_by/henry-maurice-whitcombe

        A number of them have two driving wheels with inboard cylinders. (first photo)

        Would I be right in thinking that the pistons are connected to a cranked driving axle.

        The second photo has what appears to be inboard cylinders but an outboard connecting rod.

        The third photo is just a novel French engine this cylinders half way along the frames

        .GWR 2-2-2.jpg

        south eastern 4-2-0.jpg

        french 4-2-0.jpg

        #114547
        Lambton
        Participant
          @lambton

          Eric,

          Nothing unusual about inside cylinders/pistons driving a cranked axle. A very large number of locos had this arrangement. It is not possible to have inside coupling rods.

          Correct terminology; a connecting rod connects the crank (inside or outside) to the cross head. The wheels are connected together by coupling rods that for obvious reasons can never be inside the wheels.

          Eric

          #114553
          Sub Mandrel
          Participant
            @submandrel

            Yes 1 & 2 are inside cylindered locos, not an uncommon arrangment even in later days, but not easy for the maintenance crews!

            No 2 must have a cranked layshaft where you might expect to find another axle!

            2 and 3 appear to be a Cramptons – by a British designer Robert Crampton, if built in France.

            Neil

            #114595
            Eric Cox
            Participant
              @ericcox50497

              Yes, No 2 is a Crampton buil in 1851 by Robert Stephenson company for the South Eastern Railway.

              #114687
              Alan Redgrave
              Participant
                @alanredgrave69942

                Hello Chaps———- yes, No2. has a JACKSHAFT drive…. Take a look at this }————– http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackshaft_(locomotive) ————- No3. is the image that most would associate with the name Crampton I think ??

                #114707
                Sub Mandrel
                Participant
                  @submandrel

                  Hi Alan,

                  The jackshaft design was Crampton's solution to inside cylinders driving wheels behind the firebox, so just as much a 'Crampton' as "No. 3" .

                  What a shame we can't see these curious beasties in action.

                  Neil

                  #117069
                  loco man
                  Participant
                    @locoman67579

                    An earlier post suggested that coupling rods cannot be inside the wheels. Not so. Chapelon in his 2-10-0 compounds used inside coupling rods (between the frames and hence 'inside the wheels' ) to couple the H.P. and L.P. cylinders. This arrangement is clearly shewn in the reprint of Chapelon's book "La locomotive a' vapeur" figure 319

                    #117181
                    loco man
                    Participant
                      @locoman67579

                      Sorry – but before anyone else spots the mistake- I meant 2-10-2

                    Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
                    • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

                    Latest Replies

                    Home Forums Beginners questions Topics

                    Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
                    Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

                    View full reply list.