Gentlemen all,
How very enlightening. Your comments are most appreciated. Everything fits in with de-zincification.
Here’s more of the background:
Having seen (and used) numerous brass plumbing fitting etc., I have always imagined that (especially) taps were only ever cast. Not so, it seems; but please read on.
It was necessary to replace the kitchen mixer-tap after it began to leak (from the barrel section) more than three years ago.
A few weeks ago, a tiny white spot appeared on the chromed surface of the stem of the replacement. The spot stubbornly refused to budge when wiped with a cloth. Closer inspection showed that the spot was actually weeping drops of water. For a while, it remained simply a `point’ of interest.
In the past week or two, tiny jets of water began to appear underneath the tap. See pictures 1 and 2. It was therefore necessary to replace the tap, which we did.
Being a rather inquisitive creature, I attacked the tap with a hacksaw (as you would), cutting away the offending section. To my surprise, I discovered that it wasn’t cast after all, but thin brass only 0.6mm (0.025&rdquo
thick. See picture 3.
It seemed that this section of the stem had split. It also appeared to have been extruded before being flattened into an elliptical profile. I now wonder whether there is either a crack or lines which have been overly stressed. Pictures 4 and 5 show in close up, the outside and inside surfaces respectively.
Pictures 6 and 7 were taken after I rubbed away some of the surface.
The right hand edge in Picture 6, shows three layers; brass, copper, and chrome. From my limited knowledge, this appeared to be the correct approach to chrome plating.
Would additional zinc (>15%) in the brass be there for a cost reduction, or would it make forming and shaping etc., easier?
Interesting!?
Regards,
Sam
Addendum – After heavy rain and on other occasions, Melbourne's water smells strongly of chlorine.
Hmmmm