How on earth is someone taught that they cannot weld, the statement quite literally contradicts itself, if you were taught something that would imply that you learned the subject.
I was trained at BOC on a course but I am not coded so does that mean I cannot weld so do not trust me?
Also the statement seems to imply that if the welds are not pretty then they must be poor, fusion and penetration is what is important and not looks, we are trying to be helpful here, after all we are not rebuilding Concorde.
Eight of us arrived at a new section of the apprentice training workshop, the fabrication section, on another Monday morning in our freshly cleaned white overalls. The instructor, wearing a blue lab coat, said “we will do welding today” and took two small sheets of 16 gauge stainless. Saying “watch me” he did a nice argon arc weld joining the two sheets. “Now have a go”, giving us similar sheets of stainless. After 30 minutes two of us had managed to “join” the sheets together but we all had produced big holes in the metal. On being released for lunch (the works canteen was half a mile away and you had 45 minutes for lunch) we found that we were suffering from arc-eye. We go sent home early but the training never returned to welding. I strongly believe that this was quite deliberate.
Looking back on my workshop training as a mechanical engineering apprentice NOTHING we covered was of any use in my later life as a professional engineer. However it has been of great use to me as a model engineer.
Returning to the boiler, I am still trying to understand its construction. To me the actual boiler appears to be copper within a steel chamber. Such a construction makes sense to me. If so, the actual weld quality is irrelevant but on the basis of “fit, form and function” form, or how it looks, is always important in model engineering.
JA