It is interesting how geometry can work with us or against us.
Assuming a 100mm (8"
radius circle for the indicator, a one-degree error in the spindle alignment gives us a deflection of 3.5mm (1/8"
As we can easily measure to 1/100 of this, we cal correct the spindle angle very accurately. with 0.02mm difference between the sides, the error is 0.005 of a degree.
Obviously if the error over the 200mm diameter is 0.02mm, then across a 10mm cutter it is 1/200 of that – only .0001mm – tiny and less than the flex in a very rigid machine.
As the 'dual tramming machines' have measuring points about 100mm from the spindle nose, they inmtoduce an error at the measurement point equivalent to the runout at 100mm from the holder.
If held in a collet chuck with an accuracy in the region of 0.02mm runout at 100mm, they wil roughly triple the error in the system , about 0.0003mm across the 10mm cutter.
If you hold the trammer in a drill chuck with could have 0.2mm runout at 100mm the runout across our 10mm cutter is still only 0.0011mm.
Perhaps the real message here is that we may be congratulating oursleves on getting our mill heads perfectly aligned, when what we should be doing is giving more attention to good rigid setups, accurate toolholders and sharp tools.
…and here endeth the sermon!
Neil