Posted by ega on 28/12/2015 16:37:25:
Michael Gilligan:
"this conversion is not exact"
As you may know, his article elicited at least two lengthy and learned letters tp Postbag: one from GHT and another (quite critical) from A.Shackell. I did find the article interesting, however, not least because of the light it throws on the computing scene at the time.
.
Thanks for the information, ega,
No I did not know that. … So far as I recall, I have never read the original article, or the subsequent correspondence.
My sole reason for mentioning it was to reduce risk of modern readers relying upon the statement as 'fact'.
What does surprise me [in the context of engineering/computing] is that he works to four decimals of mm, but only two decimals of inches. … Please forgive my ignorance of the article: Does he explain that oddity?
MichaelG.