Posted by Iain Downs on 12/06/2017 18:13:28:
What is the lathe you did this on btw?
It was a Harrison M300, but I avoided mention of same to avoid the inevitable comments about it being an industrial lathe rather than a modellers lathe. Quite how the metal is supposed to know that, and behave differently, I don't know.
Correct that surface roughness measurement ideally needs a special instrument. Basically it's a record stylus and a measurement circuit. Mine was secondhand and measures Ra (average) as that was simple to do with the electronics of the day. Here's the kit, complete with comparator coupon (and the name of the original owner):

Measurement of Rz (peak to peak) is now popular, and easy to do with modern electronics, and possibly a more useful measure.
You can also get Rubert sets which are electroformed plates of varying roughness and with the characteristics of various machining techniques:

Mine was also secondhand, but they are still available new:
**LINK**
For the sort of finishes one would expect from turning the fingernail is surprisingly sensitive and perfectly capable of assessing roughness in conjunction with a Rubert set.
Of course it isn't essential to be able to measure surface roughness. I just like to be able to put numbers on parameters so that I can make sensible comparisons.
I'd agree with Duncan about not using scrap, and EN1A is definitely a joy compared to EN3B. Although my experience is that EN3B is less prone to rusting.
Andrew
Damn it, too slow; that's what comes of checking the post for comprehension and spelling. May be I should reserve that for ME/MEW articles. 
Edited By Andrew Johnston on 12/06/2017 21:17:11