Excellent project, and impressive work from a man who hasn’t done any machining for 35 years. Interesting subject and the historic link adds zest. Brits who know about WW1 and WW2 are well aware that Australia was a major partner in both conflicts, so thanks again for that!
Which version of the gun are you modelling? (If it matters!) The Mk1 to Mk5 8″ howitzers were all modifications of obsolete 6″ ship and coastal defence guns. The barrels were cut short and rebored to lob 200lb 8″ shells, range up to 10,500 yards. They were installed on 5 different mountings, also modifications of older guns. For example, Carriage Mk2 was a modified 6″ BL P3 Naval Mounting, whilst the Mk3 was a modified coastal pivot mount. All combinations of gun and carriage weighed close to 14 tons.
The 8″ howitzer described on the web is usually the Mk6 version. Vickers were asked to design it in August 1915, and the first one was delivered for proof and testing in March 1916. Formally introduced into service February 1917, no doubt some were delivered earlier. Same shell, slightly longer range, with an improved standard carriage, and 5 tons lighter (most helpful even when a traction engine was available, and they were often moved by muscles.) The Mk7 and Mk8 versions were developed in the same time-frame: faster firing Asbury breech and longer range (12300 yards). Marks 1 to 6 were all declared obsolete in 1926. Mk7 and 8 survived until WW2 when most were converted into 7.2″ howitzers: much longer range and many other improvements.
Wikipedia says “1st Siege Artillery Battery was renamed the 54th Siege Artillery Battery on 28 September 1915.“, so the unit was probably equipped with pre-Mk6 conversion guns at first. However, Hogg & Thurston ‘British Artillery Weapons 1914-1918’ pictures two Mk6 howitzers manned by Australian gunners on the Western Front, and maybe the battery upgraded to Mk7 or Mk8 later. I think modelling the Mk6 is the safest bet if Inspector Meticulous is on the prowl, because the Hogg picture shows Aussies manning them.
Paint colour worries modellers who tend to assume everything military was standard. Actually, many weapons were haphazardly rushed into service during WW1, with many variants, particularly before 1917. I expect most big guns were painted approximately the same shades of military green and/or brown in the factory, but quickly repainted as necessary by the army with whatever was available locally – exigencies of the service! French paint if handy. Green if camouflaged in a wood; Brown in muddy fields; White in the snow; Sandy yellow in the desert; Grey in towns, and mixtures! Most of the photos in my Hogg book are posed in depots. Hard to tell in black and white, but they seem to be painted in the same colour throughout, whatever it is. Guns pictured in the front line tend to have have dazzle schemes (random splotches an stripes to break up the outline), and one features very light patches, possibly white. Lots of mud too – deliberately filthy. Anything to avoid being spotted; short range howitzers are highly vulnerable to long range guns.
Military gear is much more likely to be painted in standard colours in peacetime, so is the model on-parade or in action? If depicted in action, almost anything goes! Or in the factory, bare shiny metal is valid.
Looking forward to whatever is decided – thanks so much for sharing.
Dave