I would advise a proper, thorough inspection with the cladding removed. (Repairs would likely need the boiler removing from the frames, but the inspection should not).
By “proper” I mean carefully and to the standard scheme – but not to some nervous inspector’s own “gold-plated” version of it!
You say a couple of leaks; but from what? Shell joints, tube joints or around a couple of rod stays? Or just around fittings?
It would need a new boiler only if inspection reveals irrepairable faults.
The lack of test-certificate paperwork is not a problem but having the drawings available would help the inspector. A test-certificate can be organised for it by treating it as a “new” boiler – but that will mean an initial, once-only “shell test” to twice working-pressure. As would major repairs.
Obviously if it fails the shell-test, that’s it for that boiler.
The test scheme we use says boilers “… have in fact to be safe” (I quoted that not from the MELG book but from the original PER law – about the only use of the word in pages of ISO-EU-legal waffle!) but not how they are designed and built.
Otherwise there would be a lot of older model locomotives no longer able to run; although standards have improved and we no longer do things like screwing studs or fittings directly into the copper shell.
There is an important caveat.
You imply not being a member of a model-engineering society; but the scheme we use does depend on the engine-owner being a fully paid-up member of a club affiliated via an appropriate federation to the MELG (Model Engineering Liaison Group) scheme.
Your evident Midlands location suggests a club in the Northern Association of Model engineers but we do have a curious situation in which there are geographically Northern societies in the Southern federation and vice-versa! No matter: the two groups do co-operate and use the same scheme.
If that sounds bureaucratic, it isn’t really – and your subscription includes boiler-testing. Societies are not allowed to charge extra for that; nor to certify boilers belonging to people not in an affiliated society.
It is NOT a matter of cliqueiness, but at insurers’ and HSE insistence.
If you have it tested commercially you’d pay a lot of money even if you found anyone to do it.
Otherwise you could run the locomotive only in the privacy of your own back-garden railway.