Another thought: I don't know the locomotive but let's consider the geometric principles.
The ball-valve (if a rotating rather than lift type) needs rotate 90º for full movement, so 45º either side of a defined mid-point that itself gives full mid-points right along the mechanism. So at half port the handle is at mid-quadrant, irrespective of lever ratios.
If that symmetry is not there, the operating-links may become forced into trying to stretch or compress each other as they try to complete the ball arc.
I've an idea these larger BR Standard locos have a prominent reach-rod running along the boiler outside of the cladding, with a reversing-link part-way. In any such mechanism, irrespective of lever ratio or angle of arc, if the rods are parallel that link is ideally square to both rods at their mid-travel.
A similar principle would apply to the valve itself, which if a conventional ball-valve has the ball passage perpendicular to (closed) or in line with (open) the pipe. Usually the handle is parallel to the port, as an indicator; but if the valve is used in some other configuration it (or its replacement lever) may need be at 45º or even some other mid-travel angle, to it.