Ceramic Ball Bearings

This topic has 11 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 16 April 2017 at 14:42 by Keith Long.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

Author

Posts
15 April 2017 at 16:55 #25185
michael howarth 1
Participant
@michaelhowarth1
Advert

15 April 2017 at 16:55 #293481
michael howarth 1
Participant
@michaelhowarth1
Not for the first time I am having a bit of an issue with allegedly stainless steel balls in a loco safety valve. May be just a bad batch……but has anyone tried out ceramic ball bearings in this sort of application? A quick Google of their properties seems to indicate that they would be just the job.

Mick
15 April 2017 at 18:18 #293499
richardandtracy
Participant
@richardandtracy
In one of LBSC's articles he suggests putting a ball in the safety, then giving it a sharp strike to bed the valve in. Not sure what would happen with a ceramic..

Apart from that, could be a workable idea.

Richard
15 April 2017 at 22:04 #293516
julian atkins
Participant
@julianatkins58923
Hi Mick,

Yes, excellent results with the ceramic balls on check valves. Am sure they would be just as good in a safety valve apllication..

Cheers,

Julian
15 April 2017 at 22:57 #293525
Windy
Participant
@windy30762
I use stainless valve bodies and balls on my flash steamer and apart from a bit of dirt now and then they have been good.

The one thing I always check are the stainless balls 316 some of the other stainless balls materials are more magnetic and get a dark gunge colour after a short run in my application.
16 April 2017 at 00:15 #293535
Hopper
Participant
@hopper
Have you tried stainless balls from a good brand name bearing supplier such as SKF? Not all balls are created equal, specially those cheapies off the net or through intermediate suppliers for "hobby" use which sometimes seems to mean not the absolute top-of-the-line professional quality gear (with matching price of course).
16 April 2017 at 09:15 #293555
HOWARDT
Participant
@howardt
Years ago used glass balls in place of stainless steel in high pressure check valves, 2500 psi. This was because the material passing through eroded the ball and the glass lasted much longer.
16 April 2017 at 13:14 #293604
john carruthers
Participant
@johncarruthers46255
Edmund Scientific do ruby and quartz balls in various diameters, surprisingly cheap considering they are of optical surface quality.
16 April 2017 at 13:57 #293611
martin perman 1
Participant
@martinperman1
The only issue I have with ceramic balls is that they are prone to pick up any impurities and end up with "crystals" growing on them from what ever is in the water stopping the valve from seating properly. The valves we use at work have to have the balls soaked in a mild acid to remove anything which has grown as a maintenance check.

Martin P
16 April 2017 at 14:00 #293614
michael howarth 1
Participant
@michaelhowarth1
Thanks for those comments gents. It sounds as if they are worth a try.

Mick
16 April 2017 at 14:06 #293616
michael howarth 1
Participant
@michaelhowarth1
John…..I have just had a look at the edmund scientiic site…..what am I looking for? Are they lenses?

Mick
16 April 2017 at 14:42 #293620
Keith Long
Participant
@keithlong89920
Mick – look for "ball & condenser lenses"
Author

Posts