Posted by SillyOldDuffer on 05/06/2019 10:56:02:
A personal opinion about LBSC; as he grew older he became grumpy and slapdash, and he developed an intense dislike of being challenged. I find his writings range from excellent to dubious.
I quite agree, however I try to read him with open eyes – but he is always very readable even when being a rude and self opinionated ****
I find Don Young easy to read but I sometimes feel there are issues in what he recommends – after Martin Evans in the mid sixties almost sneered at designers not using boiler bushes he still allowed Don to describe County Carlow's boiler with fittings tapped directly into the backhead in 1969 and let him publish the text to justify this. And his later designs are just too complicated – look at the frames on Jersey Lily for example. However his Doncaster works articles are still a joy to read.
Early and late Martin Evans is an interesting read but while editor he became boring (in my personal opinion) and was not fun to read.
Keith Wilson was always an interesting read although his designs were and still are way beyond me!!
Personally, in my opinion, the best to read was Ken Swann – read his description of Bridget from 1970 or so and see if you agree – and while his obituary in ME a few months ago says he was scathing of designers who allowed errors to creep into his drawings, speaking to people who have built his designs say that this was not a fault to be found in his locos.
Hopefully factual and not libellous! What do you think??