As you might expect, success bending copper tube improves with greater wall thickness, a larger bend radius, well annealed tube, and a former with close width constraint. I personally have had little success with sand filling (it always eventually still kinks for a tight bend radius). Cerrobend works the first time, but not so good with reuse, though I seem to remember there is guidance somewhere of what to do about that.
You can contrive an adequate former with a circle of ply etc. of the right radius and thickness clamped in a wood vise. Bending springs work well for plumbing pipe, but annealing is essential except for very gradual bends for adjustment of alignment, and there is a very definite limit for these thin wall tubes. Small diameter bending springs tend to be a pain.
One thing to appreciate is that with a proper commercial tube bender, the inner diameter of the former has to be the neutral axis, and the outside of the bend is progressively stretched using tension and an internal nose piece to avoid flattening. That is why tight bends are a challenge with amateur methods, and there is limited potential to replicate commercial results.