Thanks Michael. In the pictures the switch appears to be well made, but the internet provides several clues:
- Bolt and locknut holding the drum segments together can slacken putting the individual switches out of alignment with each other and causing burn-outs due to poor contact.
- Suggestion rollers are made of steel, not ideal in a switch.
- Care required to ensure the metal case is earthed. (Modern requirement to connect metal covers with a separate earth wire is not met.)
- Contact opening and closing is slow, not speeded by spring loading, and making the Dewhurst unsuitable for switching under power.
- The circuit and switch type are mismatched by today's standards. It should be interlocked so the switch cannot be operated under power. A fast acting reversing switch could be substituted but isn't ideal because the motor should be stopped before reversing.
- Suggestion switch requires regular maintenance to check contacts are in good condition, lubricated and mechanically tight.
- Switch can be mis-assembled if taken apart for repair.
- Contact arms are prone to wear and bending.
- If arcing occurs, the insulation is prone to heat damage.
Many reports that Dewhurst drum switches fail after arcing, sparking or a burning smell is noticed. The list explains the why that's likely for a number of reasons – the design, materials, wear, and likely pattern of misuse all make the switch vulnerable.
I don't think any of this adds up to a need to rush out and change a serviceable Dewhurst! Despite the case for the prosecution, many Dewhursts have been trouble free for decades. But I do suggest failed switches should be replaced with something better, not with some antique off ebay!
Dave