Keith
I have a square column bench mill supplied via Chester essentially similar to the Lux but with a slightly smaller table and infinitely variable speed via VFD drive and two step pulley belt drive. R8 taper. I’ve now upgraded to a Bridgeport so have a good basis for comparison.
Leaving aside any “import quality control” issues the basic cutting capability is, in practice, similar to that of a Bridgeport. The Bridgeport will cut harder and faster but the rate of swarf production becomes uncomfortable in a domestic workshop. Once properly set-up accuracy can be as good, I fitted an proper 3 axis glass scale DRO to mine.
The two fundamental issues relate to Y-Axis travel and the head size. On mine only about half the Y-axis depth of the table can be covered by the cutter axis. This seriously reduces the work envelope as compared to a Bridgeport. The head is heavy and cumbersome to move. The power driven elevation on a Super Lux is a good idea, I got as far as finding a motor before getting sensible and upgrading. Tilt it past about 20 degrees and you aren’t gonna get it back up on your own without some form of mechanical assistance. No worm or other motion controller so its darned dangerous without a safety strap. Compared to a Bridgeport visibility past the squared off head is poor so setting up and measuring the in progress job can be a right pain. Lack of space also makes beating a job down onto parallels much trickier.
Mine gave me a lot of machining capability in a small space for which I was grateful at the time. Now I’m used to a Bridgeport I’d hate to go back even though 90% of the work i do would still fit the smaller machine. You really need to try before you buy. I’m in East Sussex, if you are in striking distance you are welcome to come and play for an hour or two. Its got to go sometime so if you liked it …
Clive