Posted by richardandtracy on 01/04/2014 10:56:42:
For some reason I find the idea of having a Euronorm for something as parochial as garden steam locomotives hysterically funny.
Is there no end to bureaucratic interference in inconsequential matters? [Don't mind me while I wipe my eyes.]
I'm not sure why it is so funny to have standards. If you want to build an engine to run on your own track you are welcome to use any gauge and wheels you like. However, if you want to run it on someone else's track you then have to make sure it will run on that track so you have to have an agreed form of track and wheels. That agreement is a form of Standard. Many people travel to events in other countries with their locos. It would be a pity to arrive and find that your loco was incompatible with, say, the points. Now whether you call that agreement a guidance, a standard, or a norm is neither here nor there.
As far as bureaucratic interference is concerned, there wasn't any. I believe that the standard I referred to was a product of the cooperation of a number of clubs from various countries.
No European standard is compulsory unless it is the subject of an EU Directive. You can build your locomotive however you like, just make sure it is suitable for any track you wish to run it on.
Russell.