Nice one Rick.

Mine is little newer and followed me through a couple of departmental moves, and eventually home after redundancy, despite being told to bin it about 1978.

I think I last used it in 1982 to rescue boss from a problem of his own making. Was he grateful. Nope! Got told off for not binning it! Considerable heat and light followed whist his position in the lower firmament was made clear.

Clive.

Not really an engineering instrument but something I hated the thought of it being destroyed so I rescued it from a skip. A Hilger & Watts theodolite.

Martin C

We used theodolites and telescopes to make the wing and fuselage jigs for aircraft at BAC Weybridge. Also has 'stick' micrometers up to 12 feel long! They were made in 3', 1' and various other lengths with a 1" micrometer on the end. They were only about 5/8" diameter, so had to have several supports along their length.
http://www.sometcz.com/en/store/bore-gauges-and-instruments/stick-micrometers-sets
BobH

Edited By Speedy Builder5 on 24/11/2017 06:52:42

Hi All,

We had this nice stick Micrmeter set a while back from a car boot, it had absolutely zero interest on EBay starting at £4.99, listed 3 times and we finally let it go at a car boot for £3!

We have had a Moore & Wright one since which made £14.

Really nice things but not wanted it seems, even by collectors.

Cheers,

Martin

John, the theodolite was made redundant by the switch to auto leveling "Dumpy" levels with a parallel plate micrometer head attached to them (reads to 0.1mm estimate to 0.01mm). We use these with Brunson (as in your link) scales or steel rules mounted in Brunson magnetic base scale holders for leveling large fabrications.

Reading 1mm over 1m between scales gives one milliradian (mrad or mils). With the micrometer head this becomes 0.1mm over 1m or 0.1mrad. Over 5m it is 0.02mrad. This is equivalent to 0.001146° or 0° 0" 4'. We stopped using precision levels for this type of work a long time ago!

Martin C

Seeing those stick micrometers again, nearly bought them but … , makes me wonder how on earth you can calibrate the set. Screw joints aren't precise at micrometer resolution and there could be 8 getting in on the act. Seems to me that its of no great use unless it can be reliably broken down and re-assembled to give consistent results.

Clive.

This Watts (before Hilger) was being thrown out from where I worked because no one could read it. I scrounged and took it home to dismantle. When it was in pieces, it was obvious why no one could read it, it had been used with coolant which had obscured the glass scale marked in degrees, and the eyepiece. When cleaned up it worked fine although not the easiest thing to use because to light needed to get in the back through a small frosted window.

It looks nice cleaned up though. I used to be an instrument calibrator and inspector so these things appeal.

Brian

Very interesting and new to me! More and more I realise I'm not keeping up. In theory I know how to use a theodolite and star sights to fix one's position on earth. The more stars used the better. It's hard work: you have to carefully record many observations and then use the results to do hard sums. In my hands the calculation is likely to go wrong. The idea of photographing a section of sky and pattern matching it against a star catalogue with a computer would never have occurred to me. That it's straightforward for amateurs with affordable kit is amazing.

I'm tempted to re-equip for astronomy. I gave up because I don't like the cold. Now it's affordable to control the telescope from indoors. I was very tempted last year but was put off by months of almost solid cloud cover. This morning I have clear blue sky. And I deserve expensive xmas presents from myself.

Dave

Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 25/11/2017 09:44:20