Thanks for the account Damian – a really inspiring job.
Your photo in post 24/09/2016 00:19:29 shows the vertical slide gib arrangement and raises a question that you and/or the forum members might be able to assist with. I hope it's not too dumb of a question…..
The Hercus 270 shaper that I'm overhauling has the same gib arrangement on its vertical table slide; that is a 'solid' trapezoidal-cross-section gib, adjusted with adjusting screws (with lock nuts) and then clamped with hex-head bolts at right angles.

My question is: How is the gib adjusted so that the locking action is able to function? From your photo, the Tom Senior lock is formed by another screw acting in the same direction and manner as the adjusting screws.
In the final stage of adjustment, are the clamping bolts tightened so that the opposite flat face (A) of the gib is pulled hard onto its mating surface and thus imposing the correct alignment to the gib? If so, how does the locking screw subsequently move (or bend, doubtful?) the gib so that the angles surfaces are pressed hard together?
Alternatively, are the clamping screws only 'nipped up' so that the locking screws is able to force the (slightly free) gib to slide in the locking direction? If this is so, then in the unlocked condition the gib would not be fully constrained and there is nothing to make the angled surfaces lie actually parallel. (The gib would likely rotate a little about the tips of the adjusting screws and only the leading edge of the dovetail would make contact).
Just to muddy the waters, the Hercus locking screw/handle differs from the Tom Senior. It is in the direction of the clamping bolts. I cannot see how it can possibly work as intended. What am I missing? (For the shaper, this slide is not intended to move under cut – it should be locked.) The Hercus has two adjusting screw/clamp bolt pairs. The locking nut acts on a through stud (shown protruding in photo) but could equally be a bolt.

Any thoughts appreciated. (Don't want to hijack this build thread – will move to a new thread if more appropriate.)
Thanks,
Rod.