Omnimill 00 feed gear

Advert

Omnimill 00 feed gear

Home Forums Manual machine tools Omnimill 00 feed gear

  • This topic has 10 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 2 May 2024 at 13:15 by Wish I was retired Barry!.
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #727511
    Wade Beatty
    Participant
      @wadebeatty78296

      Good morning from Norway,

       

      My Omnimill 00 is missing the 16T feed gear and I would like to make a new one. I have never made a gear before but have spent considerable time reading up on it and searching various sites and forums.

      The second gear, that the 16T should mesh with has 48T. With the standard Diametral or Module formulas I do not get close to a “standard” pitch or module.

      The measured OD of the 48T gear is 2.718″ or 69.037mm. I have used gauge blocks to calibrate 2 different micrometers to be sure of this dimension.

      By the Diametral Pitch formula (2 + T)/OD(in), the result is 18.39, not a standard pitch

      By the Module formula OD(mm) /(2 +T), the result is 1.38, again not a standard module

      Any constructive criticism or help appreciated

      Thanks,

      Wade

      Advert
      #727512
      JasonB
      Moderator
        @jasonb

        Can you measure the distance between the two gear centres? Then the PCD can be used rather than OD which could have been adjusted.

        #727514
        DC31k
        Participant
          @dc31k

          Can you measure the centre-to-centre distance of the shafts on which the two gears rotate?

          Do you have any of the other gears (20, 44, 39, 25, 35, 29) that you can measure?

          It is easy to find pictures of the gearbox setup plate and every combination they give adds up to 64 teeth total.

          Please check the logic of this but the centre-to-centre distance should be the same as the pitch circle diameter of a 32t gear of the appropriate specs.

          The 48t gear only ever meshes with the 16t one. The 48t one is close to 18 DP. It is possible that because the 16t one has a low number of teeth, they did a pitch shift on the gears – the 16t one made larger and the 48t one made smaller.

          A pitch shift might also be used if the dedendum on the standard pitch circle made the amount of metal between the tooth root and the gear’s bore too little.

          #727516
          bernard towers
          Participant
            @bernardtowers37738

            Sounds very much like 18DP

            #727647
            Wade Beatty
            Participant
              @wadebeatty78296

              First I want to thank everyone for their replies, I learned quite a bit from them.

               

              18DP indeed seems to be the correct pitch, I measured the diameter of the other pairs:

              35T  2.05″   18P         /  29T  1.72″  18.02P

              25T  1.5″    18P         /   39T  2.28″  17.98P

              44T  2.56″   17.56P   /    20T  1.22″  18.03

              48T  2.72″  18.38P    /    16T  1″       18P

               

              Shaft center distance is 1.785″

               

              Thanks for your help

               

              Wade

               

               

               

              #727684
              Pete Rimmer
              Participant
                @peterimmer30576

                The size for the 48T is correct. Long-addendum rules require the 16T to be increased in diameter by 55 thou for a 18DP gear (0.997/18) and the 48T would have to be decreased by the same amount. Take 0.055″ from the diameter and it works out to 18DP.

                longaddendum

                 

                #727698
                DC31k
                Participant
                  @dc31k
                  On Pete Rimmer Said:

                  Long-addendum rules…

                  And notice that the tooth count of all the pinion plus minimum-to-avoid-undercut gears in the table add up to 64, the same as the total tooth count used on the mill (16/48; 20/44; 25/39; 29/35). Coincidence or clever design by Elliott?

                  #727707
                  Wade Beatty
                  Participant
                    @wadebeatty78296

                    Thanks again for the replies. Pete Rimmer, that table is very good, what text did it come from?

                     

                    Wade

                    #727709
                    Pete Rimmer
                    Participant
                      @peterimmer30576

                      It’s from Machinery’s Handbook.

                      #727846
                      Wade Beatty
                      Participant
                        @wadebeatty78296

                        I sometimes get so hooked on looking something up on the net that I forget that Machinery’s Handbook is right next to me.

                        #728800
                        Wish I was retired Barry!
                        Participant
                          @wishiwasretiredbarry

                          Hello Wade in Norway.

                          The 16 tooth gear off my OO is 1.058″ od and 0.801″ across the root diameter.

                          Annoying not to have the gear but I tend to use the next one at 1.3″ a min still slow. However the vertical head is not very rigid. Have the swivel head as well but only a morse 2. Was trying to think how to easily make a copy for you. Tracey tools, do gear cutters but probably expensive for a one off, worth a call.

                          Regards Barry

                        Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
                        • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

                        Advert

                        Latest Replies

                        Home Forums Manual machine tools Topics

                        Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
                        Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

                        View full reply list.

                        Advert