Posted by Clive India on 15/09/2022 08:45:03:
Posted by Michael Gilligan on 14/09/2022 22:23:01:
Posted by SillyOldDuffer on 14/09/2022 18:56:36:
To find out it will be necessary to have the car fixed:
But if Robin wants to submit the form that I linked earlier … that’s one thing he must not do. MichaelG.
My opinion – Robin should get it fixed by someone else and get on with his life.
Forget about admin tripe like filling in forms for other admin geeks to paw over forever and make a big issue about how complicated it all is.
One of my few pleasures is telling my children "welcome to being a proper grown-up"! Having passed the fun stage of young adulthood they're having to deal with responsibilities clouded by wobbly health, earning a living, family issues, other people underperforming, mortgages, repairs, rapidly rising inflation and bills, bills, bills!
Michael pointing out this problem has a Catch-22 dimension is just another pin-prick in the miserable world of motoring hassle!
So I rather agree with with Clive, because in Duffer-land:
- If the cause is clearly wrongdoing, I usually pursue the wrong doer on principle. All that is necessary for evil to prosper is for good men to do nothing. But!!!
- I don't start fights unless the evidence is solid, the cost to me is proportionate, and I have a good chance of winning. I avoid conflict where the risk and cost of losing is high, emotionally or in money. At the end of the day, it's business.
Robin's evidence against the garage is suggestive but not conclusive. Nor have they attempted to profit from the situation, which is the usual con-trick – making money from unnecessary repair work. Further, it's necessary to understand the garage's terms and conditions, and I quoted an example which says: Your use of the Service is at your sole risk. The complaint may be built on sand when it comes to liability.
My analysis:
- The cause is not clearly wrongdoing
- The evidence isn't solid
- Depending on the contract agreed between Robin and the garage there may be no case in law. (What are the garage's Terms and Conditions)
- If the garage reject the claim, the cost and hassle of pursuing them could easily exceed the cost of the repair, and the chance of winning is moderate at best.
This list of negatives suggests to me that a subtle approach is required, if at all.
If I were Robin, I wouldn't invest emotionally in this. If I proceeded at all, I'd lean on the garage's desire to keep customers happy rather than attack with all guns blazing. Probably send a letter asking for a personal interview with the manager, explaining why I'm unhappy and asking them to rectify the situation. Writing and eyeballs are complementary ways of applying pressure and more powerful in combination!
Before the interview, I'd think carefully about what I was going to say, probably taking the line that I'm Mr Reasonable, but all my friends agree I've been hard done by, that a dispute might damage their reputation, and will certainly cause them cost and hassle!
I'd also think carefully about how to handle all their likely responses, which could be anything between abject surrender and thrown out by a gorilla with a big spanner. A compromise offer is quite likely, such as you pay for the parts, we pay for the labour. A compromise would appeal strongly to me.
So I'd schmooze rather than explode and retreat in the event of stiff resistance. Retreat because I don't think this one is worth starting a war over! Dunno about Robin, but I've got better things to do with my time than get emotionally entangled in a row over a defective car, especially if the garage are determined to put up a fight. If they decide to resist, remember a bigger business will have considerable experience of dealing with disgruntled customers and know the ropes whilst a small garage might be difficult to deal with because it's run by a bad-tempered idiot!
Tactically in these situations, it's usually best to start soft but firm with a clear case and negotiate. Have all the facts to hand, and be prepared for rebuttals. Shouty-shouty personalities often think aggression from the outset works best, but they're naive because an unfriendly approach often scuppers any chance of compromise. However, a great deal depends on the opposition – part of the skill behind negotiation is assessing their strengths and weaknesses so that carrot and stick are applied appropriately.
Dave