I suppose they think we are all too naïve to see how their "agreements" are slanted to put all the onus and blame on the user; and too naive to see they are treating our private lives as their commodities.
And all too naïve to see that the cookie-filter on/off switches are deliberately ambiguous, so it's often not at all clear if you are blocking the tracking companies or admitting them. Block enough of their blasted "biscuits" and they block you.
I have a secondary account I rarely use now, using MS 'Outlook', and it's now neither use nor ornament, but I can't remove it. However, its eavesdropper filters can be turned on or off selectively. They are all for vague (shell?) companies with opaque names, but I looked one up once, to find it was some wretched commercial-software firm in the USA of no relevance or interest whatsoever to me. Goodness knows what it actually did – its publicity was all Pseuds' Corner twaddle conveying only its managers' illiteracy. Luckily Outlook allows you to turn them all off by one switch, though it does not retain your settings after you close it.
I can no longer view YouTube videos and even many commercial companies' web-sites now, thanks to Google putting massive barriers between them and me. Firefox still allows open access, but for much longer before Google muscles in?
I have neither TV nor so-called "smart"-phone; my desire not to own either is increasing steadily. My "wireless" is a broadcast-services receiver, and as for so-called "smart"-'speakers and remote-controlled gadgets… not ruddy likely. (Even if I could run my Harrison L5 lathe from my 3G 'phone while having my dinner!)
'
I know many people here use Linux etc, but unfortunately, though I was not born yesterday and am very alive to the Californian shysters' antics, I am stuck with Mickeysoft because I do not have sufficient IT skills and knowledge to switch. Nor be sure my e-post lists, web-site registrations, very many files and non-MS programmes like TurboCad would still work.