Posted by Chris Trice on 26/02/2019 22:33:11:
This whole subject comes back to trust in a brand. One pays the extra specifically to avoid any uncertainties.
Exactly what's wanted, but that trust is often misplaced! Paying extra might get you a better product, or you might just be paying for the name on the packaging. Bling.
Brand-names are bought and sold freely, and it's unwise to take them at face value. A brand-name might indicate a place of manufacture, or a degree of quality. Or not. They most certainly aren't a guarantee, and even good names don't last for ever. The original Jacob's bit the dust in 1991, when they were taken over by Matco. The Jacob's brand was an asset, but how it was used in relation to quality was down to the newcomer. As they too have been taken over, the link back to classic Jacob's is tenuous.
Chaps who get hot under the collar about CE marks sometimes fall hook line and sinker for an old brand-name belonging to a global corporation they've never heard of! In this example, Jacobs happen to be owned by Danaher, or perhaps their spin-off Apex Tool Group, which is a joint venture with Cooper Industries. Apex own many tool brand-names including: Weller, Sata, Cleco, Lufkin, and Jacobs. Danaher have about 50 divisions including Matco, Leica Microsystems and Nobel Biocare. This network of firms are multinational, with factories in many different countries.
I'm afraid if the country of manufacture and quality are important, it's unwise to assume that a brand-name means much. The branded and generic products may be exactly the same item, the branded version might be better, or it might be inferior. Check before buying!
One advantage of buying generic is I don't worry about any of this. Usually buying unbranded from a reputable supplier, not too cheap, works out OK. When it doesn't I try again. So far the warning 'Buy cheap buy often' hasn't bitten me as a hobbyist. I would take more care buying critical tools if I depended on them for a living.
Dave