Posted by Nigel Watts on 19/12/2019 04:16:47:
I have asked my caster to provide me with a specification of the brass he used and that of the yellow clock brass so that I can understand the differences and talk specifics rather than generalities. He seems to have failed to understand the point that there is a spectrum of colour for different brass alloys, with those higher in copper being pinker and those higher in zinc being yellower. Fastidious clock restorers only want the yellower brass.
I feel some sympathy for the foundry, who is used to working with modern materials and methods. Your requirement is a tricky one.
When the clock was made in 1710 Brass wasn't made to a specification at all. Although Zinc was known to be a metal, it wasn't isolated until 1746. Early brass is a pot-luck product.
Brass making in 1710 involved mining Calamine (later identified as Zinc Carbonate) which occurs in association with Lead and Silver ores, mainly Galena. The mixed ores went through several crude processes intended to concentrate and separate the ores from impurities such as earth, stones and calcite. Lead and Silver aren't too difficult to extract because they melt and pour at reasonable temperatures. Zinc is much harder to separate because it vapourises and oxidizes at low temperatures; melts at 420C, boils at 907C. The vapour and oxide are both toxic.
In this period Brass was made by mixing concentrated Zinc Ore with molten Copper. By modern standards the Copper was impure, perhaps as low as 80%, and the actual content of the Zinc Ore varied from batch to batch. As they weren't adding zinc metal, it was hard to judge how much zinc was in the mix. On top of that, it was difficult to control the temperature of the furnace – slightly too hot and the Zinc would boil off. Skilled work with erratic results. Although Brass makers aimed for a high-zinc yellow brass, their output was highly variable. Brass made in 1710 is likely to contain Gold, Silver, Lead and many other impurities not found in modern metal. Old clock brass is unlikely to match any standard brass made today, because modern brass (after 1870) is made to a specification.
As British brass making was in it's infancy in 1710, it's likely this clock was made from imported brass. At that date the best brass came from Germany.
Although an exact match of colour and properties is unlikely, there's no reason why a modern high-zinc brass wouldn't be acceptable. But the requirement may be a tad more specialised than your foundry is placed to deal with, rather as Argos don't sell Rolex Watches! One problem is the fumes, the other is melting and casting a very high-zinc brass is somewhat out-of-the-ordinary. As clock restoration is a fairly common activity, it may be a matter of finding which foundry does this sort of work. It may not be easy, and it may be worth persisting with your choice who is at least trying to be helpful. Not so my nearest foundry who are high-tech, mainly aero-space. No problem if I want several tons of centrifugal castings made from almost any metal I care to name, but they're absolutely not interested in low quantity low value work. When I was a lad there were several jobbing foundries nearby, now I've not found anyone within a 50 mile radius remotely interested in doing a few simple castings. For small quantities, DIY may be the best approach -not impossible, as described by Neil.
Very impressed by what you're doing, both with the real clock and the Fusion 360 model. Hope it comes good without compromising authenticity.
Dave