NASA testing the limits of engineering again

NASA testing the limits of engineering again

Home › Forums › The Tea Room › NASA testing the limits of engineering again

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #520344
    Ady1
    Participant
      @ady1

      When it finally gets going we'll be back to our 1960s achievements of 50 years ago

      All the Russian stuff went badoom

      The Saturn 5 stuff really was at the edge of our abilities and the US did amazingly well to make it viable, albeit at huge expense

      Now we have a new generation of new people with new technology having a go at it again

      …first major glitch achieved in 60 seconds…

      —————–

      Shortly before 22:30 GMT (17:30 EST) on Saturday, the four engines ignited, burning for more than a minute before the event was aborted

      **LINK**

      #36239
      Ady1
      Participant
        @ady1
        #520346
        Neil Lickfold
        Participant
          @neillickfold44316

          Goes to show how good the engineers really were that developed the Saturn5 1st stage rocket engine. One of a few designs with zero failures. Just goes to show that the engineers in this program have not simulated nor thought out all the issues that the engines are actually facing. A lot needs to be considered , and takes very special people to be able to look at the over all system, and see the potential issues. Often single tests are totally successful , but when multiple engines are employed issues begin to arise that were not there for the single engine test. Sometimes it is a frequency clash that can cause a whole lot of previously undisclosed issues. That happened on the first multi engine aircraft.

          #520347
          David Colwill
          Participant
            @davidcolwill19261

            Not too ambitious then.

            I thought from the title that they might be trying to get them to agree on something! smile p

            I must admit, it is good to see them trying to get back to the moon.

            Regards.

            David.

            #520348
            BC Prof
            Participant
              @bcprof

              Let us hope that the engineers continue to see the "Big Picture" and not just what would meet a particular immediate goal.

              I once asked my yr 8 science class whether they would put people in a room with a pure oxygen atmosphere with anything that could burn and then lock them in . They all said no. Shame that the Apollo 1 capsule designers did not think in the same way when they were concerned with meeting certain goals.

              Brian

            Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
            • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

            Latest Replies

            Home › Forums › The Tea Room › Topics

            Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
            Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

            View full reply list.