Long tender means the controls need extending

Long tender means the controls need extending

Home Forums Locomotives Long tender means the controls need extending

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1860
    wendy jackson
    Participant
      @wendyjackson
      #427395
      wendy jackson
      Participant
        @wendyjackson

        hi. I am coming to the end of my Martin Evans designed Columbia, and need some help. The tender is very long and there is no way I will be able to get to the controls. I have figured a way to extend the regulator by using a Bowden cable. But what is the best way to extend the injector valves. Thanks.

        #427402
        Brian G
        Participant
          @briang

          Could you use a radio control servo and a servo tester to work the valves. I have seen this solution work for Columbia's regulator.

          Brian

          #427405
          wendy jackson
          Participant
            @wendyjackson

            Hi. Not to sure that would work due to the heat, and I would always worry about fire from the firebox catching any servos.

            #427412
            Nigel Bennett
            Participant
              @nigelbennett69913

              I could lend you a hacksaw to shorten your tender…

              I've seen quite a few contrivances to operate loco valves from the rear of the tender. It usually involves a number of controls attached to a cross-plate secured to the tender. The controls are usually rotary (for steam valves) and generally involve a long operating rod provided with a couple of universal joints. The "loco end" of the long operating rods also need some kind of bearing/support.

              There needs to be some provision for changing the effective length of the rods as the tender and loco negotiate curves. This could be a pin through one part of the rod and a slotted tubular section on the other. Water valves can be sited at the rear of the tender so that their operating valves can be sited where it suits you.

              It depends on how you feel about your loco; if you want it to look realistic when you aren't using it, then it would be an idea to have all the jiggery-pokery removable – but that will add to the complexity of the design.

              It does need very careful thought to make the regulator control safe; you don't want to be faced with the loco running away and you being unable to shut the regulator. Hence give a bit of thought to fail-safe design of the linkages so that if the loco-tender coupling parts, then the loco will coast to a halt.

              You've got a big task to operate a pole reverser remotely, but a screw reverser might be susceptible of remote control.

              My advice is to stay away from electronic/radio operating devices and use something mechanical.

              #427413
              wendy jackson
              Participant
                @wendyjackson

                Thanks Nigel. Lots of input. I have spoken to a chap using a Bowden cable for regulator and it clipped onto the rear wall of the tender. However as you stated the injector controls would be a lot harder to deal with. I like the idea of placing the tender controls at the rear. Thanks. Michael

                #429830
                Nigel Graham 2
                Participant
                  @nigelgraham2

                  Re the effects of curves on control-rod lengths.

                  I propose it might actually be negligible, and certainly easy to accommodate.

                  Even at this loco's curve limit, the linear movement will be small enough to allow the rod to slide through a bush; but you could make a short telescopic section based on either a slotted tube and cross-pin, or small-section square tube and bar.

                  I'd think the injector steam valves the easier, not harder, to arrange, assuming they are on the turret and have spoked-pattern hand-wheels.

                  Lever-type reversers: I have seen an extension control used on a miniature traction-engine, I think based on a tube ending in a clevis gripping the handle, and an internal rod that operated the trigger, with a suitable grip and push-button on the operating end. A Bowden cable might work but would need a return spring on the lever.

                  #429831
                  duncan webster 1
                  Participant
                    @duncanwebster1

                    If you got to **LINK** and scroll down you'll find video of a RC 5"g loco. Only the regulator, but it works a treat. Having said that if you're riding behind anyway, I'd use a more direct method, no need to over complicate the issue

                  Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
                  • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

                  Latest Replies

                  Home Forums Locomotives Topics

                  Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
                  Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

                  View full reply list.