Going slightly off topic, and in reply to Adrian R,
11 months ago we bought a brand new caravan. Ok, not one of the best, but we do have limitations re towing capacity, and I didn't want one of these super wide & super long efforts which did rather limit our choice. I did expect an insurance premium increase, and so at renewal time I was charged £292. My caravan has a tracker system fitted, for which the charge is £95 p.a.
In January, I was informed that the tracker system was not responding and that a part would need changing. Now, the caravan is stored inside an old barn, to which access is via a heavy duty locked gate. In addition, there is often a locked tractor & trailer parked in front of it inside the barn. Plus the hitch lock and the wheel clamp. The barn itself is at the end of a track in the depths of an old quarry. So I'm reasonably certain that theft is very unlikely. Malicious damage is a possibility. And the caravan is due for its annual service next month. So I decided to leave the repair until April, after all, it is still under warranty.
I therefore informed the insurance co, insurance being organised by one of the major mobile leisure industry organisations, that the tracker was faulty. Big mistake – I then got stung another £63.
As you might expect I said what I thought about this, and then started thinking.
When I started caravanning 40 years ago, I had a mortgage, two young children and a permanently hungry labrador. Having insurance was a must. Today, no mortgage, no children, no dog, and money in the bank, enough to be able to replace the caravan if a total loss occurred. Furthermore, there is no legal requirement to insure the caravan – apparently it is covered by the car insurance for third party problems when it is attached to the car (to be checked at next renewal). Plus in those 40 years, I have made three claims, all for accidental damage to the caravan and totaling no more than £1k. So, I now intend to self-insure. Furthermore, when the caravan insurance does come up for renewal, they will be left in no doubt that by charging the extra £63 they have now lost my custom. Plus, higher management of the umbrella organisation will also be told.
Similarly, the one remaining life insurance policy will also be cancelled later this year due to the stupidity of the ins.co in refusing to allow UK policy holders to pay by bank transfer when foreign policy holders can do just that. Again, they will be told why, although to be fair, I doubt if they will care.
In respect of engineering goods, none of it has a particularly high s/h value, so again self-insurance might well be satisfactory. I have to admit that house insurance does still rate as being desirable as I suspect that the cost of a total replacement might be a bit too much.
Peter G. Shaw