I have to back up John S on this one.
In the last place I worked we used the round redthane for our multi sheave drives (4 ganged), so I carried it over to my shop, Unfortunately, it gave me problems on my lathe as that seems to have mismatched sheaves, and kept throwing the belt off. Maybe the linked ones will cure my problem, I will give them a go.
But I can also attest to linked belts being far superior to a fixed length belt, purely because of the reasons John stated. I have used them many times in previous jobs.
All I can say, if you baulk at paying the difference between a fixed belt and a linked or redthane belt, then you go for the fixed belt.
Maybe 10 to 20 mins for the replacement compound belts, or a few hours for a fixed length.
Being of nearly sound body and mind, I know which one I would choose to go for. The means far outweigh the costs.
As for manufacturing costs, I think that the low tech single length belt materials and tooling costs would be a great deal less than the latest polymer materials and hi tech machinery for cutting or moulding the link or round belting.
So basically, what you are saying is that the manufacturers should sell it to us at a loss so that we can have a more efficient way of belt replacement.
Mmmm! – I don’t think so. That isn’t the way the world works nowadays.
John